A Review of Reviews on Open Educational Resources

被引:0
作者
Mishra, Sanjaya [1 ]
机构
[1] Commonwealth Learning, Burnaby, BC, Canada
来源
OPEN PRAXIS | 2025年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
open educational resources; open educational practice; tertiary review; quality assessment; integrative review; research gaps; sustainability; international cooperation; capacity building; policy; REPOSITORIES; QUALITY; OER;
D O I
10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.851
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Conceptualized as open educational resources (OER) in 2002, the field has a relatively short history. During this period, there have been some significant developments, including the availability of more resources and research publications (including literature reviews) in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. This review of reviews adopted a combined approach of tertiary review and integrative review to analyze the corpus of data collected from SCOPUS, Web of Science, Academic Premier, and Google Scholar. In all, 42 reviews on OER could be identified for the analysis, which indicated that most of these are published as journal articles, with only five published in conferences. Journal articles are published in 29 unique titles, with the International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning at the top, followed by Sustainability. 62% of these are available in open access, with most being systematic reviews. The field demonstrates high research collaboration with multiple authors in most reviews. The average quality rating of the reviews is low. Most of the reviews are published by authors from the USA, while researchers from Anadolu University and Beijing Normal University are top contributors. The thematic analysis using UNESCO's recommendation on OER as a framework indicates research gaps in the areas of sustainability and international cooperation. The study concludes with a set of guidelines to promote effective OER implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 325
页数:21
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Open education resources' benefits and challenges in the academic world: a systematic review [J].
Adil, Hafiz Muhammad ;
Ali, Shahbaz ;
Sultan, Mussarat ;
Ashiq, Murtaza ;
Rafiq, Muhammad .
GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE MEMORY AND COMMUNICATION, 2024, 73 (03) :274-291
[2]   Factors affecting the sustainability of open educational resource initiatives in higher education: A systematic review [J].
Aksoy, Dilara Arzugul ;
Kursun, Engin ;
Zawacki-Richter, Olaf .
REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2025, 13 (01)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries: Final report
[4]  
Arimoto M. M., 2012, 20 INT C COMP ED SIN
[5]   Student Experiences of Open Educational Practices: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Axe, Jo ;
Childs, Elizabeth ;
DeVries, Irwin ;
Webster, Keith .
JOURNAL OF E-LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY, 2020, 16 (04) :67-75
[6]   Analyzing the discourse on open educational resources on Twitter: a sentiment analysis approach [J].
Bhagat, Kaushal Kumar ;
Mishra, Sanjaya ;
Parida, Ashis Kumar ;
Samal, Alyal ;
Lampropoulos, Georgios ;
Dixit, Alakh .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 73 (03) :1297-1320
[7]   A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour [J].
Bond, Melissa ;
Khosravi, Hassan ;
De Laat, Maarten ;
Bergdahl, Nina ;
Negrea, Violeta ;
Oxley, Emily ;
Pham, Phuong ;
Chong, Sin Wang ;
Siemens, George .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 21 (01)
[8]  
Borokhovski E., 2022, Technology Application in Teaching and Learning: SecondOrder Review of Meta-analyses, DOI [10.56059/11599/4069, DOI 10.56059/11599/4069]
[9]   An analysis of peer reviewed publications on openness in education in half a century: Trends and patterns in the open hemisphere [J].
Bozkurt, Aras ;
Koseoglu, Suzan ;
Singh, Lenandlar .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) :78-97
[10]  
Butcher N., 2015, Commonwealth of Learning, DOI [10.56059/11599/1013, DOI 10.56059/11599/1013]