Deep learning-based risk stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ using mammography and abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Tingfeng [1 ]
Cui, Tingting [2 ]
Cao, Zhenjie [3 ]
Hu, Jintao [4 ,5 ]
Ma, Jie [6 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 1,Div Breast Surg,Dept Gen Surg,Cl, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Key Lab Biomed Engn Guangdong Prov, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Shenzhen Int Grad Sch, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Anat & Cellular Pathol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Jinan Univ, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Clin Med Coll 2, Dept Radiol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging; deep learning; prognosis; ductal carcinoma in situ; mammography; DENSE BREASTS; CANCER; OVERTREATMENT; RECURRENCE; DIAGNOSIS; THERAPY; MRI;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2025.1587882
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Current management of ductal carcinoma in situ lacks robust risk stratification tools, leading to universal surgical and radiotherapy interventions despite heterogeneous progression risks. Optimizing therapeutic balance remains a critical unmet clinical need. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed two patient cohorts. The first included 173 cases with BI-RADS category 3 or higher findings, used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of four abbreviated MRI protocols against the full diagnostic MRI. The second cohort involved 210 patients who had both mammography and abbreviated MRI. We developed two separate predictive models-one for pure ductal carcinoma in situ and another for invasive ductal carcinoma with associated ductal carcinoma in situ-by integrating clinical, imaging, and pathological features. Deep learning and natural language processing techniques were used to extract relevant features, and model performance was assessed using bootstrap validation. Results: Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging protocols demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy to the full protocol (P > 0.05), offering a faster yet effective imaging option. The pure group incorporated features like nuclear grade, calcification morphology, and lesion size, achieving an Area Under the Curve of 0.905, with 86.8% accuracy and an F1 score of 0.853. The model for invasive cases incorporated features Ki-67 status, lymph vascular invasion, and enhancement patterns, achieved an Area Under the Curve of 0.880, with 86.2% accuracy and an F1 score of 0.834. Both models showed good calibration and clinical utility, as confirmed by bootstrap resampling and decision curve analysis. Conclusion: Deep Learning-driven multimodal models enable precise ductal carcinoma in situ risk stratification, addressing overtreatment challenges. abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging achieves diagnostic parity with full diagnostic protocol, positioning Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a viable ductal carcinoma in situ screening modality.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   Application of deep learning on mammographies to discriminate between low and high-risk DCIS for patient participation in active surveillance trials [J].
Alaeikhanehshir, Sena ;
Voets, Madelon M. ;
van Duijnhoven, Frederieke H. ;
Lips, Esther H. ;
Groen, Emma J. ;
van Oirsouw, Marja C. J. ;
Hwang, Shelley E. ;
Lo, Joseph Y. ;
Wesseling, Jelle ;
Mann, Ritse M. ;
Teuwen, Jonas .
CANCER IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)
[3]   Effect of Three Decades of Screening Mammography on Breast-Cancer Incidence [J].
Bleyer, Archie ;
Welch, H. Gilbert .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (21) :1998-2005
[4]  
Chou SHS, 2021, RADIOLOGY, V301, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2021219016
[5]   Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening [J].
Comstock, Christopher E. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Newstead, Gillian M. ;
Snyder, Bradley S. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Bergin, Jennifer T. ;
Rahbar, Habib ;
Sung, Janice S. ;
Jacobs, Christina ;
Harvey, Jennifer A. ;
Nicholson, Mary H. ;
Ward, Robert C. ;
Holt, Jacqueline ;
Prather, Andrew ;
Miller, Kathy D. ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Kuhl, Christiane K. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (08) :746-756
[6]   Survival After Breast Conservation vs Mastectomy Adjusted for Comorbidity and Socioeconomic Status A Swedish National 6-Year Follow-up of 48 986 Women [J].
de Boniface, Jana ;
Szulkin, Robert ;
Johansson, Anna L. V. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (07) :628-637
[7]   Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: finding the balance between overtreatment and undertreatment [J].
Delaloge, Suzette ;
Khan, Seema Ahsan ;
Wesseling, Jelle ;
Whelan, Timothy .
LANCET, 2024, 403 (10445) :2734-2746
[8]   Assessment of Ki-67 proliferation index with deep learning in DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) [J].
Fulawka, Lukasz ;
Blaszczyk, Jakub ;
Tabakov, Martin ;
Halon, Agnieszka .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
[9]   Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011 [J].
Goldhirsch, A. ;
Wood, W. C. ;
Coates, A. S. ;
Gelber, R. D. ;
Thuerlimann, B. ;
Senn, H. -J. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (08) :1736-1747
[10]   Copy number analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ with and without recurrence [J].
Gorringe, Kylie L. ;
Hunter, Sally M. ;
Pang, Jia-Min ;
Opeskin, Ken ;
Hill, Prue ;
Rowley, Simone M. ;
Choong, David Y. H. ;
Thompson, Ella R. ;
Dobrovic, Alexander ;
Fox, Stephen B. ;
Mann, G. Bruce ;
Campbell, Ian G. .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 (09) :1174-1184