Balancing Act: A Neutrosophic Approach to Human Rights and Values in Varied Societal Contexts

被引：0

作者：

Sánchez F.C. ^{[1
]}

León K.E.C. ^{[2
]}

Rodríguez P.O.P. ^{[3
]}

Espinosa J.S.P. ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes, Ambato

[2] Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes, Santo Domingo

[3] Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes, Riobamba

来源：

Neutrosophic Sets and Systems | 2023年 / 62卷

关键词：

conflict; COPRAS; human rights; neutrosophic selection criteria; values;

D O I：

10.5281/zenodo.10436555

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This article explores the challenges that arise when human rights come into conflict with cultural, political, and ethical values in diverse societies. Eight areas of discord related to human rights are identified, and four criteria are proposed to assess how human rights relate to these values. These criteria include universality and cultural relativism, contextualization, ethical pluralism, and equity and social justice. The evaluation is based on neutrosophic selection criteria, employing the COPRAS multicriteria method. This analytical and decision-making approach is applied to eight specific cases of conflicts between human rights and values, such as women's rights, freedom of expression, and others. The results obtained provide a solid foundation for understanding how human rights relate to cultural, political, and ethical values in diverse societies. The article highlights the importance of finding a balance between protecting fundamental rights and respecting cultural and ethical diversity in resolving these conflicts. The promotion and protection of human rights remain a fundamental goal of the international community, regardless of cultural, political, or ethical differences. © (2023) All Rights Reserved.

引用

页码：1 / 10

页数：9

共 17 条

[1]

Baum E., Eutanasia, empatía, compasión y Derechos Humanos, Rev. bioética y derecho, 39, pp. 5-21, (2017)

[2]

Sanchez Rubio D., Derechos humanos, no colonialidad y otras luchas por la dignidad: una mirada parcial y situada, Campo Jurídico Rev. Direito Agroambierntal e Teor. do Direito, 3, 1, pp. 181-213, (2015)

[3]

Bernales Rojas G., El acceso a la justicia en el sistema interamericano de protección de los derechos humanos, Ius Prax, 25, 3, pp. 277-306, (2019)

[4]

Uruena R., Autoridad algorítmica:¿ cómo empezar a pensar la protección de los derechos humanos en la era del ‘big data’?, Lat. Am. Law Rev, 2, pp. 99-124, (2019)

[5]

Canaza Choque F. A., Enemigo Público. Estado de excepción global y la protección de los derechos humanos en tiempos inestables: Public Enemy. A global state of exception and the protection of human rights in unstable times, Rev. Peru. Derecho y Cienc. Política, 1, 1, pp. 1-11, (2021)

[6]

Lafferriere J. N., Lell H., Hacia una sistematización de los usos semánticos del concepto de dignidad humana en la protección internacional de derechos humanos: una revisión doctrinaria, Cuest. Const, 43, pp. 129-167, (2020)

[7]

Roy J., Kumar Sharma H., Kar S., Kazimieras Zavadskas E., Saparauskas J., An extended COPRAS model for multi-criteria decision-making problems and its application in web-based hotel evaluation and selection, Econ. Res. istraživanja, 32, 1, pp. 219-253, (2019)

[8]

Varatharajulu M., Duraiselvam M., Kumar M. B., Jayaprakash G., Baskar N., Multi criteria decision making through TOPSIS and COPRAS on drilling parameters of magnesium AZ91, J. Magnes. Alloy, 10, 10, pp. 2857-2874, (2022)

[9]

Broumi S., Talea M., Bakali A., Smarandache F., Single valued neutrosophic graphs, J. New theory, 10, pp. 86-101, (2016)

[10]

AYDIN Y., A hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model consisting of SD and COPRAS methods in performance evaluation of foreign deposit banks, Equinox J. Econ. Bus. Polit. Stud, 7, 2, pp. 160-176, (2020)

← 1 2 →