To express or not express: a motivational approach to studying political expression on social media

被引:0
作者
Lane, Daniel S. [1 ]
Neubaum, German [2 ]
机构
[1] UC Santa Barbara, Dept Commun, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Media Psychol & Educ, Essen, Germany
关键词
Social media; political expression; motivations; participation; Latent Class Analysis; SELF-PRESENTATION; FACEBOOK; GOT;
D O I
10.1080/19331681.2025.2530443
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Is political expression on social media motivated by a sincere desire to affect political change or is it a means for the politically obsessed to engage more deeply in politics? We propose an approach to studying people's motivations for expressing themselves politically in social media environments, which identifies trait-level motivations (e.g. political involvement; Krupnikov & Ryan, 2022) as structuring state-level motivations (e.g. instrumental vs. social goal-seeking). Guided by this approach, we conducted a mixed-methods study of 850 Americans. The quantitative portion of the study identified motivational classes: "Passionate Participators" (25.49%; highly politically involved and adopting a diverse set of state-level motivations), "Expressive Defenders" (36.81%; moderately politically involved, motivated to combat discrimination and inform others), and "Awareness Raisers" (37.70%; low in political involvement, motivated by raising awareness). A qualitative thematic analysis of open-ended responses identified emergent motivational themes: 1) regulating and expressing emotions, 2) correcting misinformation and discourse,& 3) managing relationships. Integrating findings from both analyses, we offer insights into the structure of motivations for political expression on social media and highlight motivational forces that arise from the interaction between social media technologies and contemporary politics.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Allen Danielle., 2015, VOICE INFLUENCE UNDE
[2]   Hierarchical representation of motives in goal setting [J].
Bagozzi, RP ;
Bergami, M ;
Leone, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :915-943
[3]  
Bail Christopher, 2021, Breaking the social media prism: how to make our platforms less polarizing, DOI [10.1515/9780691216508, DOI 10.1515/9780691216508]
[4]   Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers [J].
Bandhu, Din ;
Mohan, M. Murali ;
Nittala, Noel Anurag Prashanth ;
Jadhav, Pravin ;
Bhadauria, Alok ;
Saxena, Kuldeep K. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2024, 244
[5]   Hostile Media Perceptions, Presumed Media Influence, and Political Talk: Expanding the Corrective Action Hypothesis [J].
Barnidge, Matthew ;
Rojas, Hernando .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (02) :135-156
[6]   The Psychology of Online Political Hostility: A Comprehensive, Cross-National Test of the Mismatch Hypothesis [J].
Bor, Alexander ;
Petersen, Michael Bang .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2022, 116 (01) :1-18
[7]   Moral outrage in the digital age [J].
Crockett, M. J. .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 1 (11) :769-771
[8]   Motivations for Political Discussion: Antecedents and Consequences on Civic Engagement [J].
de Zuniga, Homero Gil ;
Valenzuela, Sebastian ;
Weeks, Brian E. .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (04) :533-552
[9]   From Mediatized Emotion to Digital Affect Cultures: New Technologies and Global Flows of Emotion [J].
Doeveling, Katrin ;
Harju, Anu A. ;
Sommer, Denise .
SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2018, 4 (01)
[10]   Does Civic Education Foster Civic Duty? A Systematic Cross-Country Analysis of the Effect of Three Forms of Civic Education on the Sense of Civic Duty to Vote [J].
Feitosa, Fernando .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2020, 53 (04) :887-901