Human-Robot Interaction in Dynamic Work Environment: Implications for Workers' Situational Awareness

被引:0
作者
Ibrahim, Abdullahi [1 ]
Xu, Jia [1 ]
Cheon, Seoyoung [1 ]
Wang, Xi [2 ]
Nnaji, Chukwuma [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, 101 Coke Bldg, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, 333 Francis Hall, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, 317 Francis Hall, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Human-robot interaction; Worker safety; Situational awareness; Work dynamism; STATISTICAL POWER ANALYSIS; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; CONSTRUCTION; SAFETY; FATIGUE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-16453
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
As the construction industry gradually transitions to Industry 5.0 due to the growing integration of unmanned aerial vehicles and unmanned ground vehicles, the safety risks associated with human-robot interaction (HRI) have become a major concern. The increased dynamism associated with HRI highlights the need to understand the risks and hazards in this new ecosystem. However, limited research assesses the impact of dynamic work environments and HRI on workers' situational awareness (SA). Moreover, a few studies have evaluated the potential role of individual factors when exploring this relationship. This study investigated workers' SA in dynamic construction settings with robots using virtual simulations of critical lift, deep excavation, work at height, and bricklaying operations. Work dynamism and dynamic robotic environment reduced participants' SA by 6.75% and 5.95%, respectively. Work dynamism led to a reduction in participants' hazard recognition performance ranging from 15% to 53%, whereas the dynamic robotic environment resulted in a reduction between 3% and 18%. Conversely, work dynamism caused an increase in safety risk perception (SRP) between 9% and 69%, while the dynamic robotic environment resulted in a variable change in SRP, ranging from a decrease of 28% to an increase of 35%. The present study contributes to construction safety research by providing insight into the relationship between workplace dynamism and SA, thereby providing useful information that could be used to shape safety practices and advance situational HRI research.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 101 条
[11]  
Brazley M. D., 2018, Int. J. Archit. Arts Appl, V4, P10, DOI [10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180402.11, DOI 10.11648/J.IJAAA.20180402.11]
[12]  
Brooke J., 1995, SUS: A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale, DOI [10.1201/9781498710411-35, DOI 10.1201/9781498710411-35]
[13]  
Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024, TABLE A-9. Fatal occupational injuries by event or exposure for all fatal injuries and major private industry sector, all United States, 2023
[14]   Process hazard analysis, hazard identification and scenario definition: Are the conventional tools sufficient, or should and can we do much better? [J].
Cameron, Ian ;
Mannan, Sam ;
Nemeth, Erzsebet ;
Park, Sunhwa ;
Pasman, Hans ;
Rogers, William ;
Seligmann, Benjamin .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2017, 110 :53-70
[15]   Safety hazard identification on construction projects [J].
Carter, G ;
Smith, SD .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 132 (02) :197-205
[16]  
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), 2023, Struck-By injuries in the construction sector: Common hazards, barriers, and opportunities to keep workers safe
[17]   Revealing the "Invisible Gorilla" in construction: Estimating construction safety through mental workload assessment [J].
Chen, Jiayu ;
Song, Xinyi ;
Lin, Zhenghang .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2016, 63 :173-183
[18]   VR-Based investigation of forklift operator situation awareness for preventing collision accidents [J].
Choi, Minji ;
Ahn, Seungjun ;
Seo, JoonOh .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 136
[19]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, V2nd ed., DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[20]  
Dini A., 2017, P 2017 IEEE RSJ INT