A Preference Analysis Method Considering the Asymmetric Impact and Competitors Driven by Group Wisdom and Influence Mining From Online Reviews

被引:0
作者
Nie, Ru-Xin [1 ]
Tu, Meng-Meng [1 ]
Tian, Zhang-Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
关键词
asymmetric impact; competitive environments; group wisdom; online reviews; preference analysis; IMPORTANCE-PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; ANALYSIS IPA; SATISFACTION; ATTRIBUTES; FRAMEWORK; SENTIMENT; DYNAMICS; SCALE; TRUST;
D O I
10.1155/int/2901174
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Consumers increasingly post online reviews concerning products or services on the social media platforms. Online reviews have become a reliable data source for extracting consumer preferences. Importance-performance analysis (IPA) is widely used in preference analysis, but it normally ignores the effects of the performance of competitors as well as the asymmetric between requirements and satisfaction. Therefore, this study extends the IPA model and proposes a preference analysis method that considers asymmetric impact and competitors based on group wisdom and influence mining from online reviews. To do so, after identifying service attributes from online reviews, preferences hidden in massive online reviews are quantified using linguistic distribution assessments. Then, the influence of reviewers is measured by introducing both the relationship influence and the information influence from different types of reviewers as group wisdom to determine the performance of service attributes. The concept of competitive dominance degree is defined as the degree of competitive advantage relative to that of competitors under realistic contexts. The preference analysis method of this study reflects group wisdom and competitive environments more realistically. Its applicability and effectiveness have been testified in the hospitality industry.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 60 条
[11]   Importance-performance analysis (IPA) of sustainable tourism initiatives: The resident perspective [J].
Boley, B. Bynum ;
McGehee, Nancy Gard ;
Hammett, A. L. Tom .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2017, 58 :66-77
[12]   The Classification of Extranet Attributes in Terms of Their Asymmetric Influences on Overall User Satisfaction: An Introduction to Asymmetric Impact-Performance Analysis [J].
Caber, Meltem ;
Albayrak, Tahir ;
Loiacono, Eleanor T. .
JOURNAL OF TRAVEL RESEARCH, 2013, 52 (01) :106-116
[13]   Improving importance-performance analysis: The role of the zone of tolerance and competitor performance. The case of Taiwan's hot spring hotels [J].
Chen, Kuan-Yu .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 :260-272
[14]   Helpfulness of user-generated reviews as a function of review sentiment, product type and information quality [J].
Chua, Alton Y. K. ;
Banerjee, Snehasish .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 54 :547-554
[15]   Computing the Numerical Scale of the Linguistic Term Set for the 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Model [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Xu, Yinfeng ;
Yu, Shui .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2009, 17 (06) :1366-1378
[16]   Analysis of the perceived value of online tourism reviews: Influence of readability and reviewer characteristics [J].
Fang, Bin ;
Ye, Qiang ;
Kucukusta, Deniz ;
Law, Rob .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 :498-506
[17]   A hybrid machine learning framework for analyzing human decision-making through learning preferences * , ** [J].
Guo, Mengzhuo ;
Zhang, Qingpeng ;
Liao, Xiuwu ;
Chen, Frank Youhua ;
Zeng, Daniel Dajun .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 101
[18]  
Herzberg F., 1959, MOTIVATION WORK
[19]   How Does the Knowledge Association of Online Travel Reviews Affect Tourism Purchase Behavior? An Empirical Study Based on Knowledge Network Perspective [J].
Hou, Zhiping ;
Liu, Benyue ;
Liu, Shengyou ;
Liu, Fangkun .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, :8221-8248
[20]   What do hotel customers complain about? Text analysis using structural topic model [J].
Hu, Nan ;
Zhang, Ting ;
Gao, Baojun ;
Bose, Indranil .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 72 :417-426