A review of blockchain consensus mechanisms for Peer-to-Peer electricity trading

被引:0
作者
Lin, Guixu [1 ]
Jian, Jie
Zhang, Haoran [2 ,3 ]
Guo, Zhiling [3 ,4 ]
Song, Xuan [5 ]
Yan, Jinyue [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Informat Sci & Technol, 7 Chome-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[2] Peking Univ, Sch Urban Planning & Design, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Tokyo, Ctr Spatial Informat Sci, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778568, Japan
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg Environm & Energy Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Univ Sci & Technol SUSTech, SUSTech UTokyo Joint Res Ctr Super Smart City, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
关键词
Blockchain; Consensus mechanism; Peer-to-peer; Electricity trading; TRANSACTIVE ENERGY-SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGIES; ALGORITHM; OPERATION; SECURITY; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2025.115720
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The growing utilization of renewable energy and the diversification of electricity services are expected to be the prominent characteristics of future electricity trading. Peer-to-Peer (P2P) electricity markets are considered as promising trading platforms that can accommodate new trading participants and meet flexible trading requirements. Among various P2P implementation platforms, blockchain has demonstrated its potential in facilitating electricity trading. This paper adopts a blockchain-centric perspective and provides a taxonomy of mainstream consensus mechanisms currently used in electricity trading. Representative consensus mechanisms are carefully chosen, and the latest research in the electricity market is incorporated to explore their advantages, disadvantages, and potential application scenarios. Finally, This paper concludes by summarizing the future research trends related to consensus mechanisms in P2P electricity trading.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]   A cyber-layer based on weighted average consensus in blockchain environment for accurate sharing of power systems' dynamic states [J].
Abdelsalam, Hany A. ;
Eldosouky, Abdelrahman ;
Elgebaly, Ahmed E. ;
Khalaf, Mohsen ;
Diab, Ahmed A. Zaki ;
Rangarajan, Shriram S. ;
Alghamdi, Sultan ;
Albalawi, Hani .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2024, 155
[2]   Consensus Mechanism for Blockchain-Enabled Vehicle-to-Vehicle Energy Trading in the Internet of Electric Vehicles [J].
Abishu, Hayla Nahom ;
Seid, Abegaz Mohammed ;
Yacob, Yasin Habtamu ;
Ayall, Tewodros ;
Sun, Guolin ;
Liu, Guisong .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 71 (01) :946-960
[3]   Security and Privacy in Decentralized Energy Trading Through Multi-Signatures, Blockchain and Anonymous Messaging Streams [J].
Aitzhan, Nurzhan Zhumabekuly ;
Svetinovic, Davor .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2018, 15 (05) :840-852
[4]   Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities [J].
Andoni, Merlinda ;
Robu, Valentin ;
Flynn, David ;
Abram, Simone ;
Geach, Dale ;
Jenkins, David ;
McCallum, Peter ;
Peacock, Andrew .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 100 :143-174
[5]   Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchains [J].
Androulaki, Elli ;
Barger, Artem ;
Bortnikov, Vita ;
Cachin, Christian ;
Christidis, Konstantinos ;
De Caro, Angelo ;
Enyeart, David ;
Ferris, Christopher ;
Laventman, Gennady ;
Manevich, Yacov ;
Muralidharan, Srinivasan ;
Murthy, Chet ;
Binh Nguyen ;
Sethi, Manish ;
Singh, Gari ;
Smith, Keith ;
Sorniotti, Alessandro ;
Stathakopoulou, Chrysoula ;
Vukolic, Marko ;
Cocco, Sharon Weed ;
Yellick, Jason .
EUROSYS '18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH EUROSYS CONFERENCE, 2018,
[6]  
[Anonymous], Proof of authority
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Nxt whitepaper revision 4
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Hyperledger sawtooth project
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index
[10]   RBFT: Redundant Byzantine Fault Tolerance [J].
Aublin, Pierre-Louis ;
Ben Mokhtar, Sonia ;
Quema, Vivien .
2013 IEEE 33RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS (ICDCS), 2013, :297-306