Can ESG advantages mitigate corporate financial risk? New empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

被引:0
作者
Li, Kunming [1 ]
Wen, Jianhua [2 ]
Zhou, Ziran [1 ]
Xiao, Zhixing [1 ]
Shi, Wenming [3 ]
Huang, Zhencheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Maritime & Logist Management, Australian Maritime Coll, Room F96,Swanson Bldg,Locked Bag 1397, Launceston, Tas 7250, Australia
关键词
Corporate financial risk; ESG advantages; economic policy uncertainty; institutional environment; sustainable development; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; AGENCY COSTS; INVESTMENT; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; IMPACT; FIRM; CONSTRAINTS; DEBT;
D O I
10.1080/15567249.2025.2531207
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The sustainable development strategy has reshaped a company's business philosophy and motivated it to develop environmental, social, and governance (ESG) advantages to mitigate its corporate financial risk (CFR). To verify this, a sample of A-share listed non-financial companies over 2009-2021 is employed in this study. The main findings are threefold: First, a company's ESG advantages can reduce its CFR significantly, which is strengthened by high economic policy uncertainties and weak institutional environments. Second, as indicated in the mechanism analysis, the above impact of ESG advantages on CFR is potentially transmitted through financial constraints and agency costs. Third, there is evidence in support of the robustness of the estimated panel models and the elimination of the endogeneity problem. These findings provide a new ESG perspective for understanding influential factors of a company's sustainable business development and profound evidence for implementing ESG policies and regulations to improve a company's financial performance.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[51]   Advertising, research and development, and systematic risk of the firm [J].
McAlister, Leigh ;
Srinivasan, Raji ;
Kim, MinChung .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2007, 71 (01) :35-48
[52]  
McWilliams A, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P603, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO
[53]  
2-3
[54]   PRICING OF CORPORATE DEBT - RISK STRUCTURE OF INTEREST RATES [J].
MERTON, RC .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1974, 29 (02) :449-470
[55]   Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior [J].
Mohr, LA ;
Webb, DJ ;
Harris, KE .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 2001, 35 (01) :45-72
[56]  
Morellec E., 2007, Review of Finance, V11, P1, DOI DOI 10.1093/ROF/RFM001
[57]   FINANCIAL RATIOS AND THE PROBABILISTIC PREDICTION OF BANKRUPTCY [J].
OHLSON, JA .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1980, 18 (01) :109-131
[58]   Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance [J].
Peloza, J .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2006, 48 (02) :52-+
[59]   ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings [J].
Reber, Beat ;
Gold, Agnes ;
Gold, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2022, 179 (03) :867-886
[60]   Corporate non-financial disclosure, firm value, risk, and agency costs: evidence from Italian listed companies [J].
Rossi, Fabrizio ;
Harjoto, Maretno A. .
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 14 (05) :1149-1181