Can ESG advantages mitigate corporate financial risk? New empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

被引:0
作者
Li, Kunming [1 ]
Wen, Jianhua [2 ]
Zhou, Ziran [1 ]
Xiao, Zhixing [1 ]
Shi, Wenming [3 ]
Huang, Zhencheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Maritime & Logist Management, Australian Maritime Coll, Room F96,Swanson Bldg,Locked Bag 1397, Launceston, Tas 7250, Australia
关键词
Corporate financial risk; ESG advantages; economic policy uncertainty; institutional environment; sustainable development; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; AGENCY COSTS; INVESTMENT; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; IMPACT; FIRM; CONSTRAINTS; DEBT;
D O I
10.1080/15567249.2025.2531207
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The sustainable development strategy has reshaped a company's business philosophy and motivated it to develop environmental, social, and governance (ESG) advantages to mitigate its corporate financial risk (CFR). To verify this, a sample of A-share listed non-financial companies over 2009-2021 is employed in this study. The main findings are threefold: First, a company's ESG advantages can reduce its CFR significantly, which is strengthened by high economic policy uncertainties and weak institutional environments. Second, as indicated in the mechanism analysis, the above impact of ESG advantages on CFR is potentially transmitted through financial constraints and agency costs. Third, there is evidence in support of the robustness of the estimated panel models and the elimination of the endogeneity problem. These findings provide a new ESG perspective for understanding influential factors of a company's sustainable business development and profound evidence for implementing ESG policies and regulations to improve a company's financial performance.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Al-Thaqeb S.A., 2019, The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, V20, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.JECA.2019.E00133, 10.1016/j.jeca.2019.e00133]
[2]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence [J].
Albuquerque, Rui ;
Koskinen, Yrjo ;
Zhang, Chendi .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (10) :4451-4469
[3]   Agency costs and ownership structure [J].
Ang, JS ;
Cole, RA ;
Lin, JW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (01) :81-106
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Who Cares Wins: Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World
[5]   International R&D sourcing, innovation and firm age: The advantage of ?born-international sourcers? [J].
Asimakopoulos, Grigorios ;
Revilla, Antonio ;
Rodriguez, Alicia .
TECHNOVATION, 2023, 122
[6]   Quality minus junk [J].
Asness, Clifford S. ;
Frazzini, Andrea ;
Pedersen, Lasse Heje .
REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2019, 24 (01) :34-112
[7]   ESG government risk and international IPO underpricing [J].
Baker, Edward D. ;
Boulton, Thomas J. ;
Braga-Alves, Marcus, V ;
Morey, Matthew R. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 67
[8]   Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) :1593-1636
[9]   Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value [J].
Bardos, Katsiaryna Salavei ;
Ertugrul, Mine ;
Gao, Lucia Silva .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 62
[10]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency [J].
Benlemlih, Mohammed ;
Bitar, Mohammad .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 148 (03) :647-671