Assessment of soil biological quality under long-term rice-wheat cropping system: Effect of continuous vs. residual organic nutrient inputs

被引:0
作者
Chanu, Loitongbam Joymati [1 ,2 ]
Purakayastha, Tapan Jyoti [2 ]
Bhaduri, Debarati [3 ]
Ali, Muhammad Fraz [4 ]
Shivay, Yashbir S. [5 ]
Saren, Samapti [2 ]
Kumar, Vikas [6 ]
Alhomrani, Majid [7 ,8 ]
Alamri, Abdulhakeem S. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Res Complex NEH Reg, Div Syst Res & Engn, Umiam 793103, Meghalaya, India
[2] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Soil Sci & Agr Chem, New Delhi 110012, India
[3] ICAR Cent Rice Res Inst, Crop Prod Div, Cuttack 753006, Odisha, India
[4] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Agron, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[5] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Agron, New Delhi 110012, India
[6] Vivekananda Global Univ, Dept Agr, Jaipur 302017, India
[7] Taif Univ, Fac Appl Med Sci, Dept Clin Labs Sci, Taif, Saudi Arabia
[8] Taif Univ, Res Ctr Hlth Sci, Taif, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Soil Biological indicators; Soil biological quality index; Soil enzymes; Microbial metabolic quotient; Organic nutrient management; Green manure; Rice-wheat system productivity; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ENZYME-ACTIVITIES; NITROGEN MINERALIZATION; AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS; NO-TILL; AMENDMENTS; BIOMASS; MANURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.still.2025.106725
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The goal of the study was to identify the key biological indicators of soil quality under multiyear of repeated organic manuring in either rice and residual effect in wheat (System I), wheat and residual effect in rice (System II) or both rice + wheat (System III) under subtropical climatic condition. The treatments were farmyard manure (FYM), Sesbania green manure (SGM), SGM with blue green algae (BGA), SGM+FYM, SGM+FYM+ BGA in rice; Leucaena green manure (LGLM), LGLM with Azotobacter (AZB), LGLM+FYM, LGLM+FYM+AZB in wheat. The soil samples were analyzed for soil biological properties such as basal respiration (BR), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial metabolic quotient (MMQ), potential mineralizable nitrogen (PMN); and soil enzymatic activities viz. dehydrogenase (DHA), fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolase, acid and alkaline phosphatases (AcPA and AlkPA), arylsulfatase (ArylSA) activities. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) identified key indicators viz. AcPA, MMQ, MBC (system I), FDA, and MMQ (system II); BR, DHA, MBC (system III). Fourteen years' application of organics in system III enhanced the PMN (26 %, 43 %), FDA (31 %, 17 %), AlkPA (8 %, 9 %), AcPA (7 %, 11 %), ArylSA (36 %, 11 %) and REY (9 %, 12 %) over the system I and II, respectively. The treatment (SGM/ LGLM+FYM+ BGA/AZB) in system III triggered the soil biological quality index (SBQI), and maximized the REY (rice equivalent yield). The study proved that the application of different combination of organic manures in rice, instead of wheat, may be recommended for improvement of both SBQI and productivity of rice-wheat system in semi-arid sub-tropical region of India. The identified biological indicators can be validated and used for indexing the SBQI for monitoring the time-to-time changes in soil biological health under the changing organic management system and this finding can be implemented in and around the Indo-Gangetic plain and in larger context to south and south-east Asia having similar soil type, environmental condition and cropping systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]   Crop yield, plant nutrient uptake and soil physicochemical properties under organic soil amendments and nitrogen fertilization on Nitisols [J].
Agegnehu, Getachew ;
Nelson, Paul N. ;
Bird, Michael I. .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2016, 160 :1-13
[2]  
AICRP-IFS, 2015, Annual Report of Integrated Farming System
[3]   Microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after the application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil [J].
Albiach, R ;
Canet, R ;
Pomares, F ;
Ingelmo, F .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 75 (01) :43-48
[4]   Protein-Mineral Interactions: Molecular Dynamics Simulations Capture Importance of Variations in Mineral Surface Composition and Structure [J].
Andersen, Amity ;
Reardon, Patrick N. ;
Chacon, Stephany S. ;
Qafoku, Nikolla P. ;
Washton, Nancy M. ;
Kleber, Markus .
LANGMUIR, 2016, 32 (24) :6194-6209
[5]  
Anderson J. P. E., 1982, Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, P831
[6]   PHYSIOLOGICAL METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT OF MICROBIAL BIOMASS IN SOILS [J].
ANDERSON, JPE ;
DOMSCH, KH .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1978, 10 (03) :215-221
[7]  
ANDERSON TH, 1985, BIOL FERT SOILS, V1, P81, DOI 10.1007/BF00255134
[8]  
ANDERSON TH, 1994, BEYOND THE BIOMASS, P67
[9]   A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Mitchell, JP .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 90 (01) :25-45
[10]   The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Cambardella, CA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2004, 68 (06) :1945-1962