Predicting Resilient Modulus of Fine-Grained Soils Using Support Vector Machine-RBF and Random Forest

被引:0
作者
Tilahun, Yonas [1 ]
Qinghua, Xiao [1 ]
Ashango, Argaw Asha [2 ]
Dame, Shume [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, Adama Science and Technology University, P.O. Box. 188, Adama
关键词
fine-grained soils; random forest; resilient modulus; SVM-RBF; Taylor diagram;
D O I
10.1155/amse/6503045
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The resilient modulus (Mr) of subgrade soils is an important element in road pavement structural design procedures. However, because of regional differences in soil parameters and the nature of test procedures, determining Mr in the laboratory has become cumbersome. The purpose of this study is to develop a reliable soft computing approach for forecasting Mr of subgrade soils using support vector machine-based linear kernel (SVM-LR), polynomial kernel (SVM-Poly), radial basic function (SVM-RBF), and random forest (RF) techniques. For this purpose, a dataset of 138 soil samples from diverse geographical locations in Ethiopia was gathered, and the models were trained and tested using an 85% training and 15% test data split. All of the recommended models used confining pressure (CP), notional maximum axial stress (NmaxAS), specific gravity, P#200, silt%, clay%, liquid limit (LL), plasticity index (PI), maximum dry density, Wopt, and swell as input variables. The correctness of the proposed models was assessed by comparing predicted and observed Mr values with various statistical approaches such as root means square error (RMSE), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and determination coefficient (R2). The support vector machine RBF model outperformed all other models in validation, with R2 values of 0.99 and 0.91, MAE of 0.1 and 1.76, MSE of 0.01 and 29.54, and RMSE of 0.1 and 5.43. The Taylor diagrams of the test and training datasets show that the SVM-RBF model outperforms the other models. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impact of input variable quantity on the output of Mr for the MPL model, and it was determined that the top five essential parameters are, in decreasing order, LL, P#200, silt%, PI, and clay%. In contrast, the nominal maximum axial stress and Gs have the least impact. Copyright © 2025 Yonas Tilahun et al. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, (1993)
[2]  
Guide for Mechanistic Empirical Design Pavement Structures, NCHRP Rep, (2004)
[3]  
Zaman M., Solanki P., Ebrahimi A., White L., Neural Network Modeling of Resilient Modulus Using Routine Subgrade Soil Properties, International Journal of Geomechanics, 10, pp. 1-12, (2010)
[4]  
Jain R., Pandey S.P., Saxena A.K., A Review Study on the Performance of Flexible Pavements, Macromolecular Symposia, 407, (2023)
[5]  
Witczak M.W., Qi X., Mirza M.W., Use of Nonlinear Subgrade Modulus in AASHTO Design Procedure, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 121, pp. 273-282, (1995)
[6]  
Chen J., Morgan S., Ritchey R., Edil T.B., Vogel M.G., Neutralization of High PH and Alkalinity Effluent from Recycled Concrete Aggregate by Common Subgrade Soil, (2020)
[7]  
Ghanizadeh A.R., Amlashi A.T., Prediction of Fine-Grained Soils Resilient Modulus Using Hybrid ANN-PSO, SVM-PSO and ANFIS-PSO Methods, Quarterly Journal of Transportation Engineering, 9, pp. 159-181, (2018)
[8]  
Khasawneh M.A., Laboratory Characterization of Cohesive Subgrade Materials, (2005)
[9]  
Nazzal M.D., Louay N.M., Estimation of Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils Using Falling Weight Deflectometer, Transportation Research Record, pp. 1-10, (2010)
[10]  
Ozsahin T.S., Oruc S., Neural Network Model for Resilient Modulus of Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures, Construction and Building Materials, 22, pp. 1436-1445, (2008)