The influence of CEO succession on ambidextrous strategies in family versus nonfamily SMEs: A knowledge- and resource-based view

被引:0
作者
Hannevig, Hilde [1 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Sch Business & Econ, POB 6050 Langnes, NO-9037 Tromso, Norway
关键词
Organizational ambidexterity; strategic continuity; ambidextrous leaders; knowledge management; family versus nonfamily SMEs; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; ANTECEDENTS; MANAGEMENT; CONSEQUENCES; EVOLUTIONARY; PERSPECTIVE; COMMITMENT; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1177/23409444251343099
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Chief executive officer (CEO) succession is a critical event for Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), often leading to significant organizational and strategic changes, uncertainty, and the risk of failure if mishandled. An essential yet underexplored topic is how CEO succession influences the long-term strategy of organizational ambidexterity (OA). This inductive multiple-case study investigates this influence by comparing three family and two nonfamily SMEs in Norway. Using the knowledge- and resource-based theories, the findings indicate that maintaining OA post-succession requires: (1) a clear strategic intent for OA before succession; (2) successors who have ambidextrous leadership abilities, the ability to acquire these skills, or the capability to build ambidextrous teams; (3) effective transfer of knowledge and networks; (4) appropriate organizational structures; and (5) a culture that supports OA. The study highlights similarities and differences between family and nonfamily firms, offering insights into how and why CEO succession affects strategic continuity in SMEs.JEL CLASSIFICATION: D22, M10
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[2]   Top management team turnover, CEO succession type, and strategic change [J].
Barron, John M. ;
Chulkov, Drnitriy V. ;
Waddell, Glen R. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2011, 64 (08) :904-910
[3]  
Berg A., 2022, Many got rid of their corona-animalsAstrid did the opposite
[4]   A REVIEW OF THE CEO SUCCESSION LITERATURE AND A FUTURE RESEARCH PROGRAM [J].
Berns, Kristin V. D. ;
Klarner, Patricia .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) :83-108
[5]  
Cabrera-Suarez K., 2001, Family Business Review, V14, P37, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00037.X
[6]  
Chakma R, 2024, J MANAGE ORGAN, V30, P2367, DOI [10.58311/jeconteach/cedd1957186f7061ea2b2dcc999dd3e59490be1e, 10.1017/jmo.2023.17]
[7]   Shifting gears: Role of CEO turnover on shifts between exploration and exploitation [J].
Choi, Yoonhee ;
Benner, Mary .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2025, 191
[8]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[9]   Succession in family versus nonfamily SMEs: What influence does it have on performance? [J].
Colot, Olivier ;
Bauweraerts, Jonathan .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION, 2014, 31 (03) :149-159
[10]   Researching entrepreneurship through phenomenological inquiry - Philosophical and methodological issues [J].
Cope, J .
INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL-RESEARCHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2005, 23 (02) :163-189