Number of Lymph Nodes Examined as a Prognosis Factor in Patients With Stage II or III Colon Cancer

被引:0
作者
Kim, Hyunwook [1 ]
Shen, Lingjie [2 ]
Jeon, Jeongseok [3 ]
Han, Yoon Dae [4 ]
Han, Dai Hoon [4 ]
Jung, Minsun [5 ]
Shin, Seo Jeong [6 ]
You, Seng Chan [6 ,7 ]
Kim, Nam Kyu [4 ]
Min, Byung Soh [4 ]
Hur, Hyuk [4 ]
Ahn, Joong Bae [1 ]
Shin, Sang Joon [1 ]
Gestel, Anna Jacoba van [2 ]
van Erning, Felice N. [2 ,8 ]
Geleijnse, Gijs [2 ]
Kim, Han Sang [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Yonsei Canc Ctr, Dept Internal Med,Div Med Oncol, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res & Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ Hlth Syst, Inst Innovat Digital Healthcare, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Syst Informat, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
Colon Cancer; Cutoff; High risk; Lymph node yield; N2; disease; Overall survival; COLORECTAL-CANCER; HARVEST; YIELD; CARCINOMA; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clcc.2025.02.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The examination of 12 lymph nodes (LNs) has long been the benchmark for assessing treatment quality in colorectal cancer. However, as LN yields increase, there is a growing need to reassess the optimal cutoff for accurate prognosis in colon cancer. Using data from the Yonsei Cancer Center Registry (YCC) and validated with the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), we found that examining >= 20 LNs was associated with improved 6-year overall survival in stage II-III colon cancer and increased detection of pN2 disease, compared to the standard threshold of 12 LNs. Background: Lymph node (LN) examination is important for staging colorectal cancer. Examining < 12 LN has been associated with a poor prognosis. However, surgical and pathological advances have led to increase examined LN, necessitating the reassessment of the best cutoff for prognosis. Patients and Methods: We reviewed patients with stage II-III colon cancer from the Yonsei Cancer Center Registry (YCC) database and the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). The optimal LN cutoff was determined by comparison with hazard ratio (HR) in 12 LN. We compared higher vs. lower LN cutoff effects on a 6-year overall survival (OS). Results: From 2005 to 2015, the proportion with < 12 LN decreased significantly ( P < .001). There was no significant association between 6-year OS and LN yield in all stages II-III patients (HR = 1.21, P = .116), stage II (HR = 1.39, P = .068), and stage III (HR = 1.18, P = .297) colon cancer based on the standard 12 LN examined, whereas the 20 LN cutoff examined was associated with a significant increase in 6-year OS in all patients (HR = 1.51, P < .001). Multivariate regression revealed a significant decrease in 6-year OS in stage II (HR = 1.39, P = .026) and stage III (HR = 1.47, P < .001) with < 20 LN yield. In the NCR, < 20 LN was associated with poorer 6-year OS in stage II-III patients (HR = 1.25, P < .001), stage II (HR = 1.43, P < .001), and stage III (HR = 1.13, P = .007). Conclusion: Over the past decade, inadequate LN examinations have significantly decreased. Compared to < 12 LN, < 20 LN examined is more associated with a worse prognosis in patients who underwent surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 289.e4
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J].
Argiles, G. ;
Tabernero, J. ;
Labianca, R. ;
Hochhauser, D. ;
Salazar, R. ;
Iveson, T. ;
Laurent-Puig, P. ;
Quirke, P. ;
Yoshino, T. ;
Taieb, J. ;
Martinelli, E. ;
Arnold, D. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 (10) :1291-1305
[2]   Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: A population-based study [J].
Baxter, NN ;
Virnig, DJ ;
Rothenberger, DA ;
Morris, AM ;
Jessurun, J ;
Virnig, BA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (03) :219-225
[3]   High Lymph Node Yield is Related to Microsatellite Instability in Colon Cancer [J].
Belt, E. J. Th ;
Velde, E. A. Te ;
Krijgsman, O. ;
Brosens, R. P. M. ;
Tijssen, M. ;
van Essen, H. F. ;
Stockmann, H. B. A. C. ;
Bril, H. ;
Carvalho, B. ;
Ylstra, B. ;
Bonjer, H. J. ;
Meijer, G. A. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (04) :1222-1230
[4]  
Benson AB, 2023, PLYM M PA NAT COMPR
[5]   Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: A national hospital report card [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Russell, Thomas R. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (18) :1310-1317
[6]  
Caplin S, 1998, CANCER, V83, P666, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980815)83:4<666::AID-CNCR6>3.3.CO
[7]  
2-S
[8]   Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: Systematic review [J].
Chang, George J. ;
Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A. ;
Skibber, John M. ;
Moyer, Virginia A. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (06) :433-441
[9]   Clinical and Pathologic Factors That Predict Lymph Node Yield From Surgical Specimens in Colorectal Cancer A Population-Based Study [J].
Chou, Joanne F. ;
Row, David ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Liu, Yi-Hai ;
Schrag, Deborah ;
Weiser, Martin R. .
CANCER, 2010, 116 (11) :2560-2570
[10]   Population-based study to re-evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer [J].
Del Paggio, J. C. ;
Peng, Y. ;
Wei, X. ;
Nanji, S. ;
MacDonald, P. H. ;
Nair, C. Krishnan ;
Booth, C. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (08) :1087-1096