Life-cycle thinking and performance-based design of bridges: A state-of-the-art review

被引:1
作者
Al Hawarneh, Alaa [1 ]
Alam, M. Shahria [1 ]
Ruparathna, Rajeev [2 ]
Pantazopoulou, Stavroula J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V 1V1V7, Canada
[2] Univ Windsor, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 401 Sunset Ave, Windsor, ON, Canada
[3] York Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON M3 J 1P3, Canada
来源
RESILIENT CITIES AND STRUCTURES | 2025年 / 4卷 / 02期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Life-cycle analysis; Life-cycle sustainability; Life-cycle performance; Multiple-hazards; Resiliency; Climate change; RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION; REINFORCED-CONCRETE; COST-ANALYSIS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; DECISION-MAKING; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; MANAGEMENT; CORROSION; STRATEGIES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.rcns.2025.03.003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Given the growing emphasis on life-cycle analysis in bridge design, the design community is transitioning from the concept of performance-based design in structural engineering to a performance-based design approach within a life-cycle context. This approach considers various indicators, including cost, environmental impact, and societal factors when designing bridges. This shift enables a comprehensive assessment of structural resilience by examining the bridge's ability to endure various hazards throughout its lifespan. This study provides a comprehensive review of two key research domains that have emerged in the field of bridge life-cycle analysis, namely life-cycle sustainability (LCS) and life-cycle performance (LCP). The discussion on the LCS of bridges encompasses both assessment-based and optimization-based studies, while the exploration of LCP focuses on research examining structures subjected to deterioration over their service life due to deprecating phenomena such as corrosion and relative humidity changes, as well as extreme hazards like earthquakes and floods. Moreover, this study discusses the integration between LCS and LCP, highlighting how combined consideration of these factors can minimize damage costs, improve resiliency, and extend the lifespan of the structure. A detailed evaluation encompasses various life-cycle metrics, structural performance indicators, time-dependent modelling techniques, and analysis methods proposed in the literature. Additionally, the research identifies critical gaps and trends in life-cycle analysis within the realm of bridge engineering, providing a concise yet thorough overview for advancing considerations in the life-cycle design of bridges.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 45
页数:16
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Al Hawarneh A, 2025, J Struct Eng
[2]   Novel time-dependent seismic fragility assessment tool for existing RC highway bridges in a multi-hazard environment considering regular maintenance [J].
Al Hawarneh, Alaa ;
Alam, M. Shahria .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2025, 330
[3]   Seismic Drift Estimates of Corroded Piers: A Multihazard Approach Utilizing 3D-IDA Analysis With Time Stamps Considering Climate Change Effects [J].
Al Hawarneh, Alaa ;
Alam, M. Shahria ;
Pantazopoulou, Stavroula J. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2025, 54 (03) :1044-1063
[4]  
Alaloul W S., 2021, Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis in Infrastructure Projects: A Systematic Review
[5]   Life cycle cost optimisation in highway concrete bridges management [J].
Almeida, Joana O. ;
Teixeira, Paulo F. ;
Delgado, Raimundo M. .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2015, 11 (10) :1263-1276
[6]  
Ang A. H., 2001, Comput. Struct. Eng. Int. J, V1, P59
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code CAN/CSA-S6-14
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Canada Infrastructure Report Card
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, AASHTO LRFD BRIDG DE, V7th
[10]  
Biondini Fabio, 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 Structures Congress. Structures Congress 2012, P1906, DOI 10.1061/9780784412367.167