An Investigation of Distance Education Students' Interaction Experiences

被引:0
作者
Yildiz, Esma [1 ]
Tuzun, Hakan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Egitim Fak, Bilgisayar & Ogretim Teknol Egitimi Bolumu, Ankara, Turkiye
来源
YUKSEKOGRETIM DERGISI | 2023年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
Distance Education; Interaction; Experience; ONLINE; SATISFACTION; PERCEPTIONS; FRAMEWORK; LEARNER;
D O I
10.53478/yuksekogretim.1199744
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study is to investigate the interaction experiences of distance education students within the framework of interaction types. The interaction experiences of 10 undergraduate distance education students were examined in the study using the phenomenological method. Research data were collected using a semi-structured interview form and analyzed using a seven-step phenomenological analysis method. How students make sense of interaction in distance education was defined by four themes: interobjectivity, timing, intimacy and immediacy, and readiness. The study discussed the propositions of interaction equivalence theory in light of the participants' views. The results suggest that other types of interaction can be ignored when student-content or student-instructor interaction is at a high level. The results also show that student-content, student-instructor, and student-student interaction are important in distance education, ranked from most important to least important. The common opinion of all participants is that the most important type of interaction in distance education is student-content interaction. The findings obtained by this study can raise awareness among stakeholders by understanding the interaction experiences of distance education students, and help proactively increase their potential interaction experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 392
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice [J].
Abrami, Philip C. ;
Bernard, Robert M. ;
Bures, Eva M. ;
Borokhovski, Eugene ;
Tamim, Rana M. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 23 (2-3) :82-103
[2]  
Anderson T., 2003, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, V4, DOI [10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149, DOI 10.19173/IRRODL.V4I2.149]
[3]  
Anderson T., 1998, Distance learners in higher education, P97
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, American Heritage dictionary of the English language, V4th
[5]   EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION [J].
ARGYLE, M ;
DEAN, J .
SOCIOMETRY, 1965, 28 (03) :289-304
[6]  
Balat Ş, 2020, Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, V6, P19
[7]  
Banna Jinan, 2015, J Online Learn Teach, V11, P249
[8]  
Becker JD, 2022, ONLINE LEARN, V26, P296, DOI 10.24059/olj.v26i2.2642
[9]   A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education [J].
Bernard, Robert M. ;
Abrami, Philip C. ;
Borokhovski, Eugene ;
Wade, C. Anne ;
Tamim, Rana M. ;
Surkes, Michael A. ;
Bethel, Edward Clement .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 79 (03) :1243-1289
[10]  
Black P., 1998, Policy, Practice, V5, P7, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102