German medical students views regarding artificial intelligence in medicine: A cross-sectional survey

被引:17
作者
Mclennan, Stuart [1 ]
Meyer, Andrea [2 ]
Schreyer, Korbinian [1 ]
Buyx, Alena [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Hist & Ethics Med, TUM Sch Med, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Psychol, Div Clin Psychol & Epidemiol, Basel, Switzerland
来源
PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH | 2022年 / 1卷 / 10期
关键词
ETHICS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000114
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Medical students will likely be most impacted by the envisaged move to artificial intelligence (AI) driven digital medicine, and there is a need to better understand their views regarding the use of AI technology in medicine. This study aimed to explore German medical students <acute accent> views about AI in medicine. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in October 2019 with all new medical students at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich and the Technical University Munich. This represented approximately 10% of all new medical students in Germany. Results A total of 844 medical students participated (91.9% response rate). Two thirds (64.4%) did not feel well informed about AI in medicine. Just over a half (57.4%) of students thought that AI has useful applications in medicine, particularly in drug research and development (82.5%), less so for clinical uses. Male students were more likely to agree with advantages of AI, and female participants were more likely to be concerned about disadvantages. The vast majority of students thought that when AI is used in medicine that it is important that there are legal rules regarding liability (97%) and oversight mechanisms (93.7%), that physicians should be consulted prior to implementation (96.8%), that developers should be able to explain to them the details of the algorithm (95.6%), that algorithms should use representative data (93.9%), and that patients should always be informed when AI is used (93.5%). Conclusions Medical schools and continuing medical education organisers need to promptly develop programs to ensure that clinicians are able to fully realize the potential of AI technology. It is also important that legal rules and oversight are implemented to ensure that future clinicians are not faced with a workplace where important issues around responsibility are not clearly regulated.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Artificial Intelligence for Europe
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, A Starcruiser for Space Force: Thinking Through the Imminent Transformation of Spacepower
[3]   Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Primary Care: Exploratory Qualitative Study of UK General Practitioners' Views [J].
Blease, Charlotte ;
Kaptchuk, Ted J. ;
Bernstein, Michael H. ;
Mandl, Kenneth D. ;
Halamka, John D. ;
DesRoches, Catherine M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (03)
[4]  
Bostrom N, 2014, CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P316
[5]  
Celi LA, 2019, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V1, pE255, DOI 10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30127-x
[6]  
Coeckelbergh M., 2019, Technology and regulation, V2019, P31, DOI [10.26116/techreg.2019.003, DOI 10.26116/TECHREG.2019.003]
[7]   Health Care Robotics: Qualitative Exploration of Key Challenges and Future Directions [J].
Cresswell, Kathrin ;
Cunningham-Burley, Sarah ;
Sheikh, Aziz .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (07)
[8]  
Davenport TH, 2018, NEJM Catalyst, DOI [10.1056/CAT.18.0151, DOI 10.1056/CAT.18.0151]
[9]  
Davenport Thomas, 2019, Future Healthc J, V6, P94, DOI 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94
[10]   Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on [J].
Djulbegovic, Benjamin ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
LANCET, 2017, 390 (10092) :415-423