Enhancing the Reliability of Integrated Consensus Strategies to Boost Docking-Based Screening Campaigns Using Publicly Available Docking Programs

被引:0
作者
Scardino, Valeria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Galarce, M. Justina [1 ,4 ]
Mignone, M. Emilia [1 ,4 ]
Cavasotto, Claudio N. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Austral, CONICET, Computat Drug Design & Biomed Informat Lab, Inst Invest Med Traslac IIMT, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Univ Austral, Austral Inst Appl Artificial Intelligence, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Meton AI Inc, Wilmington, DE USA
[4] Univ Austral, Fac Ingn, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[5] Univ Austral, Fac Ciencias Biomed, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
consensus docking; exponential consensus ranking; high-throughput docking; structure-based virtual screening; SCORING FUNCTIONS; LIGANDS; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTION; DECOYS; POSE; SETS; ICM;
D O I
10.1002/minf.2445
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The use of docking-based virtual screening is today an established critical component within the drug discovery pipeline. In the context where the performance of molecular docking has been found to depend on the protein target and the program, consensus docking has been found to be a valuable approach to enhance the performance of high-throughput docking (HTD). We present and evaluate an integrated pose and ranking consensus approach that combines the advantages of pose consensus and the exponential consensus ranking (ECR) approach, using only publicly available docking programs (rDock, DOCK 6, Auto Dock 4, PLANTS, and Vina). Based on a thorough analysis performed to assess the optimal combination of matching poses and ECR thresholds, using a benchmarking set of 50 protein targets of diverse families and different property-matched ligand/decoy libraries, this enhanced pose/ranking consensus approach displayed a notably superior performance than the individual docking programs, and the ECR. This approach was also evaluated in HTD campaigns using larger libraries (similar to 1.1 million molecules) on six targets, thus obtaining an average improvement of the ECR of about 40%. We thus may say that this pose/ranking consensus methodology can be confidently used in prospective HTD campaigns using free-available docking programs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   ICM - A NEW METHOD FOR PROTEIN MODELING AND DESIGN - APPLICATIONS TO DOCKING AND STRUCTURE PREDICTION FROM THE DISTORTED NATIVE CONFORMATION [J].
ABAGYAN, R ;
TOTROV, M ;
KUZNETSOV, D .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 15 (05) :488-506
[2]   DOCK 6: Impact of New Features and Current Docking Performance [J].
Allen, William J. ;
Balius, Trent E. ;
Mukherjee, Sudipto ;
Brozell, Scott R. ;
Moustakas, Demetri T. ;
Lang, P. Therese ;
Case, David A. ;
Kuntz, Irwin D. ;
Rizzo, Robert C. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 36 (15) :1132-1156
[3]   Comprehensive Survey of Consensus Docking for High-Throughput Virtual Screening [J].
Blanes-Mira, Clara ;
Fernandez-Aguado, Pilar ;
De Andres-Lopez, Jorge ;
Fernandez-Carvajal, Asia ;
Ferrer-Montiel, Antonio ;
Fernandez-Ballester, Gregorio .
MOLECULES, 2023, 28 (01)
[4]   High-Throughput Docking Using Quantum Mechanical Scoring [J].
Cavasotto, Claudio N. ;
Aucar, M. Gabriela .
FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY, 2020, 8
[5]   Benchmark of four popular virtual screening programs: construction of the active/decoy dataset remains a major determinant of measured performance [J].
Chaput, Ludovic ;
Martinez-Sanz, Juan ;
Saettel, Nicolas ;
Mouawad, Liliane .
JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS, 2016, 8 :1-17
[6]   Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening [J].
Chen, Lieyang ;
Cruz, Anthony ;
Ramsey, Steven ;
Dickson, Callum J. ;
Duca, Jose S. ;
Hornak, Viktor ;
Koes, David R. ;
Kurtzman, Tom .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (08)
[7]   Ligand and Decoy Sets for Docking to G Protein-Coupled Receptors [J].
Gatica, Edgar A. ;
Cavasotto, Claudio N. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2012, 52 (01) :1-6
[8]   Empirical Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Virtual Screening: Applications, Critical Aspects, and Challenges [J].
Guedes, Isabella A. ;
Pereira, Felipe S. S. ;
Dardenne, Laurent E. .
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 9
[9]   Receptor-ligand molecular docking [J].
Guedes I.A. ;
de Magalhães C.S. ;
Dardenne L.E. .
Biophysical Reviews, 2014, 6 (1) :75-87
[10]   Consensus Docking: Improving the Reliability of Docking in a Virtual Screening Context [J].
Houston, Douglas R. ;
Walkinshaw, Malcolm D. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2013, 53 (02) :384-390