Comparative analysis of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of bioactive versus conventional orthodontic adhesives: An in-vitro study

被引:0
作者
Bukhari, Kawthar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alaydaa, Rawan [3 ]
Alhazmi, Rana [3 ]
Alharbi, Abdulaziz [3 ]
Alahmadi, Omar [3 ]
Zafar, Muhammad [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Almarhoumi, Asim [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent Sci, Medina, Saudi Arabia
[2] Taibah Univ, Dent Hosp, Medina, Saudi Arabia
[3] Taibah Univ, Univ Dent Hosp, Medina, Saudi Arabia
[4] Taibah Univ, Dent Coll & Hosp, Coll Dent, Dept Prevent Dental Sci, Prince Abdulmajeed St, Medina 42313, Saudi Arabia
[5] Taibah Univ, Dent Hosp, Dent Coll & Hosp, Prince Abdulmajeed St, Medina 42313, Saudi Arabia
[6] Ajman Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Clin Sci, POB 346, Ajman, U Arab Emirates
[7] Ajman Univ, Ctr Med & Bioallied Hlth Sci Res, POB 346, Ajman, U Arab Emirates
[8] Jordan Univ, Sch Dent, Amman 19328, Jordan
关键词
Orthodontic adhesives; Shear bond strength; Bioactive materials; Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI); Debonding characteristics; GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT; ENAMEL;
D O I
10.1007/s44445-025-00002-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Adhesives are essential for attaching orthodontic brackets to the tooth surface and ensuring safe removal during debonding. ACTIVA (TM) BioACTIVE-Restorative (ABR) is a bioactive composite with potential advantages. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of ACTIVA (TM) BioACTIVE-Restorative (ABR) with conventional adhesives, including Transbond XT (TM) (TXT) and Orthocem (TM) (OC). A total of 51 human maxillary premolars were distributed randomly into three groups (n = 17). Each group was bonded with one adhesive following the manufacturer's protocols. Then were subjected to 5000 thermocycles to simulate oral conditions. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and ARI scores were visually analysed under magnification. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA and chi-squared tests, with a 0.05 level of significance. Mean SBS values were 11.26 MPa, 12.52 MPa, and 12.96 MPa for ABR, TXT, and OC, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.513). ARI analysis revealed significant differences (p = 0.009) as ABR predominantly exhibited ARI 3 scores, indicating no adhesive remnants on enamel. In contrast, TXT and OC groups showed higher adhesive retention. ABR demonstrated shear bond strength comparable to conventional adhesives, meeting the clinical thresholds for orthodontic use. But demonstrated more complete adhesive failure in the enamel-adhesive interface rather than cohesive failure within the adhesive material like in TXT and OC.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Ali NAM., 2024, J Baghdad Coll Dent, V36, P54, DOI [10.26477/jbcd.v36i2.3678, DOI 10.26477/JBCD.V36I2.3678]
[2]   Degradation and Stabilization of Resin-Dentine Interfaces in Polymeric Dental Adhesives: An Updated Review [J].
Amin, Faiza ;
Fareed, Muhammad Amber ;
Zafar, Muhammad Sohail ;
Khurshid, Zohaib ;
Palma, Paulo J. ;
Kumar, Naresh .
COATINGS, 2022, 12 (08)
[3]  
Bayani Shahin, 2015, Dent Res J (Isfahan), V12, P265
[4]  
Bhadra Dhaval, 2019, J Conserv Dent, V22, P92, DOI 10.4103/JCD.JCD_511_18
[5]   Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets [J].
Bishara, SE ;
VonWald, L ;
Laffoon, JF ;
Warren, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2001, 119 (06) :621-624
[6]   A novel application of a bioactive material as a pit and fissure sealant: in vitro pilot study evaluating the sealing ability and penetration [J].
Bishayi, D. ;
Srinivasan, A. ;
Mahabala, K. Y. ;
Natarajan, S. ;
Rao, A. ;
Nayak, A. P. .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 24 (02) :195-201
[7]   A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative methods for the assessment of adhesive remnant after bracket debonding [J].
Cehreli, S. Burcak ;
Polat-Ozsoy, Omur ;
Sar, Cagla ;
Cubukcu, H. Evren ;
Cehreli, Zafer C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 34 (02) :188-192
[8]  
Davari A., 2011, Iranian J Orthod, V6, P17
[9]  
Eminkahyagil N, 2006, ANGLE ORTHOD, V76, P314
[10]  
Esmaily M., 2023, Iranian Journal of Orthodontics, V18, P1