What constitutes CLIL teacher assessment literacy? Insights from CLIL researchers and teachers

被引:0
作者
Xin, Jieting Jerry [1 ]
Lo, Yuen Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Educ, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
CLIL; bilingual education; assessment; teacher assessment literacy; KNOWLEDGE; ISSUES; L1;
D O I
10.1080/01434632.2025.2507900
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Assessment in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) programmes is complex due to the mediating role of L2. CLIL teachers need assessment literacy for effective assessment practice. But what constitutes CLIL teacher assessment literacy? This study addresses this important question by investigating researchers' and teachers' views of CLIL teacher assessment literacy. Data were collected from individual interviews with 15 CLIL researchers and 11 CLIL teachers. Assessment materials were also collected from the teacher participants. Thematic analysis revealed both teachers and researchers agreed that an assessment-literate CLIL teacher should have knowledge and skills of (1) deciding on assessment purposes; (2) deciding on assessment dimensions; (3) diversifying assessment tasks; (4) providing assessment scaffolding; (5) interpreting assessment data; (6) informing instruction and providing support; (7) seeking cross-curricular collaboration; and (8) realising the impact of contextual factors. Despite such shared understanding, different groups have different foci. Teachers focused on knowing and doing CLIL assessment, while researchers showed more concerns about teacher conceptions, language awareness, and teacher identity in assessment. These findings provide a more thorough understanding of CLIL teacher assessment literacy, thereby advancing theoretical discussion and research on CLIL assessment. They also shed light on CLIL teacher education in the under-explored area of assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Abell SK, 2011, PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE BASE OF SCIENCE TEACHING, P205, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_12
[2]   A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity [J].
Akkerman, Sanne F. ;
Meijer, Paulien C. .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2011, 27 (02) :308-319
[3]  
Andrews S., 2017, Language awareness and multilingualism, P219, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-02240-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02240-6]
[4]  
Andrews S., 2007, TEACHER LANGUAGE AWA
[5]  
Barbero Teresina, ASSESSMENT TOOLS PRA
[6]   CLIL methodology, materials and resources, and assessment in a monolingual context: an analysis of stakeholders' perceptions in Andalusia [J].
Barrios, Elvira ;
Milla Lara, Maria Dolores .
LANGUAGE LEARNING JOURNAL, 2020, 48 (01) :60-80
[7]  
Basse R., 2020, Assessment and Learning in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms: Approaches and Conceptualisations, P189, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-54128-68, 10.1007/978-3-030-54128, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-54128]
[8]   Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 9 (01) :3-26
[9]  
Brookhart S., 2011, EDUC MEAS-ISSUES PRA, V30, P3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2010.00195.X
[10]  
Brown G. T., 2008, Conceptioons of Assessment: Understanding What Assessment Means to Teachers and Students