Efficient and Near-Optimal Online Portfolio Selection

被引:0
作者
Jezequel, Remi [1 ,2 ]
Ostrovskii, Dmitrii [3 ,4 ]
Gaillard, Pierre [5 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Normale Super, Inria, F-75230 Paris, France
[2] Ecole Normale Super, Dept Informat, F-75230 Paris, France
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Math, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] H Milton Stewart Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[5] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, Lab Jean Kuntzmann,Inria, F-38000 Grenoble, France
关键词
online learning; portfolio selection; self-concordant barriers; UNIVERSAL PORTFOLIOS; AGGREGATION; ALGORITHMS; BOUNDS;
D O I
10.1287/moor.2023.0175
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In the problem of online portfolio selection as formulated by Cover [Cover TM (1991) Universal portfolios. Math. Finance 1(1):1-29], the trader repeatedly distributes the trader's capital over d assets in each of T > 1 rounds with the goal of maximizing the total return. Cover proposed an algorithm, termed "universal portfolios," that performs nearly as well as the best (in hindsight) static assignment of a portfolio with an O(d log(T)) logarithmic regret. Without imposing any restrictions on the market, this guarantee is known to be worst case optimal, and no other algorithm attaining it has been discovered so far. Unfortunately, Cover's algorithm crucially relies on computing a certain d-dimensional integral, which must be approximated in any implementation; this results in a prohibitive O(sic)(d(4)(T + d)(14)) per-round runtime for the fastest known implementation. We propose an algorithm for online portfolio selection that satisfies essentially the same regret guarantee as universal portfolios-up to a constant factor and replacement of log(T) with log(T + d)-yet has a drastically reduced runtime of O(sic)(d(2)(T + d)) per round. The selected portfolio minimizes the observed logarithmic loss regularized with the log-determinant of its Hessian- equivalently, the hybrid logarithmic-volumetric barrier of the polytope specified by the asset return vectors. As such, our work reveals surprising connections of online portfolio selection with two classic topics in optimization theory: cutting-plane and interior-point algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Agarwal A., 2006, P INT C MACH LEARN P, P9
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Found. Trends Optim., DOI DOI 10.1561/2400000013
[3]   Volumetric path following algorithms for linear programming [J].
Anstreicher, KM .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1997, 76 (01) :245-263
[4]   Large step volumetric potential reduction algorithms for linear programming [J].
Anstreicher, KM .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1996, 62 :521-538
[5]  
Bapat R.B., 1997, Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications
[6]   OPTIMAL BOUNDS FOR AGGREGATION OF AFFINE ESTIMATORS [J].
Bellec, Pierre C. .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2018, 46 (01) :30-59
[7]   Optimal exponential bounds for aggregation of density estimators [J].
Bellec, Pierre C. .
BERNOULLI, 2017, 23 (01) :219-248
[8]   Universal portfolios with and without transaction costs [J].
Blum, A ;
Kalai, A .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1999, 35 (03) :193-205
[9]  
Boyd S., 2004, Convex optimization, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511804441
[10]  
BROSSE N., 2017, C LEARNING THEORY, V65, P319