Angle of progression as a potential risk factor for emergency cesarean section following induction of labor in Japanese nulliparous women at term

被引:0
作者
Shinohara, Satoshi [1 ]
Sunami, Rei [1 ]
Yasuda, Genki [1 ]
Kasai, Mayuko [1 ]
机构
[1] Yamanashi Prefectural Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi 4008506, Japan
关键词
angle of progression; emergency cesarean section; labor arrest; labor induction; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; 2ND-STAGE; DURATION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1111/jog.16343
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim To examine the association between the angle of progression (AOP) measured before labor induction and the occurrence of emergency cesarean section (ECS). Additionally, a predictive model was developed for ECS following labor induction using sonographic and clinical data accessible to obstetricians. Methods This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at the Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital between January 2022 and July 2024. A total of 143 nulliparous Japanese women with singleton term pregnancies in the cephalic presentation were recruited. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound examinations were performed before labor induction. All variables with a p-value of <0.05 in the bivariate analysis were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine the association between AOP and ECS and to identify AOP cutoff values predictive of ECS. Results The incidence of ECS was 39.9% (57/143). Multivariable analysis indicated that the AOP (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.94) and pre-pregnancy body mass index (adjusted OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.27) were associated with ECS. The prediction model had a sensitivity and specificity of 82.5% and 82.6%, respectively (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.88). The optimal AOP cutoff point for predicting ECS was 91.2 degrees (AUC: 0.77). Conclusion The ECS prediction model incorporating AOP may facilitate individualized counseling before labor induction. Women with an AOP less than 91.2 degrees are at an elevated risk for ECS.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Parturition dysfunction in obesity: time to target the pathobiology [J].
Carlson, Nicole S. ;
Hernandez, Teri L. ;
Hurt, K. Joseph .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 13
[2]   A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour [J].
Coates, Dominiek ;
Makris, Angela ;
Catling, Christine ;
Henry, Amanda ;
Scarf, Vanessa ;
Watts, Nicole ;
Fox, Deborah ;
Thirukumar, Purshaiyna ;
Wong, Vincent ;
Russell, Hamish ;
Homer, Caroline .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01)
[3]   Factors predicting labor induction success: A critical analysis [J].
Crane, Joan M. G. .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (03) :573-584
[4]   Prediction models for determining the success of labour induction: A systematic review and critical analysis [J].
D'Souza, Rohan ;
Ashraf, Rizwana ;
Foroutan, Farid .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 79 :42-54
[5]   Neonatal outcomes associated with mode of subsequent birth after a previous caesarean section in a first pregnancy: a Swedish population-based register study between 1999 and 2015 [J].
Dencker, Anna ;
Thelin, Ida Lyckestam ;
Smith, Valerie ;
Lundgren, Ingela ;
Nilsson, Christina ;
Li, Huiqi ;
Ladfors, Lars ;
Elfvin, Anders .
BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2022, 6 (01)
[6]  
Deurenberg P, 2002, Obes Rev, V3, P141, DOI 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2002.00065.x
[7]   Risk factors for seizures in the vigorous term neonate: A population-based register study of singleton births in Sweden [J].
Dickmark, Malin ;
Agren, Johan ;
Hellstrom-Westas, Lena ;
Jonsson, Maria .
PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02)
[8]   Risk Factors for Cesarean Delivery in Preterm, Term and Post-Term Patients Undergoing Induction of Labor with an Unfavorable Cervix [J].
Ennen, Christopher S. ;
Bofill, James A. ;
Magann, Everett F. ;
Bass, John D. ;
Chauhan, Suneet P. ;
Morrison, John C. .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2009, 67 (02) :113-117
[9]   Risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labor [J].
Feinstein, U ;
Sheiner, E ;
Levy, A ;
Hallak, M ;
Mazor, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2002, 77 (01) :7-14
[10]   Comparison of different methods of measuring angle of progression in prediction of labor outcome [J].
Frick, A. ;
Kostiv, V. ;
Vojtassakova, D. ;
Akolekar, R. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 55 (03) :391-400