Effect of chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, and hydrogen peroxide irrigation on pain and swelling after mandibular third molar surgery: randomized controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Shahraki, M. [1 ]
Khazaei, A. H. [2 ]
Hakimi, S. [1 ]
Hasheminasab, M. [3 ]
Haradasht, S. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Zahedan Univ Med Sci, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Khalij e Fars Blvd, Zahedan, Sistan & Baluch, Iran
[2] Zahedan Univ Med Sci, Oral & Dent Dis Res Ctr, Fac Dent, Zahedan, Iran
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodont & Prevent Dent, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Mandible; Third molar; Chlorhexidine; Povidone-iodine; Hydrogen peroxide; Postoperative complications; SURGICAL REMOVAL; COMPLICATIONS; SALINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of irrigation solutions containing chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, or hydrogen peroxide on pain and swelling following mandibular third molar surgery. This prospective randomized controlled trial employed a single-blind design. Overall, 112 patients were randomized to four groups based on the antiseptic assigned for the intervention: control, chlorhexidine (CHX), povidone-iodine (PI), and hydrogen peroxide (HP). The patients were followed up on days 1, 3, 7, and 15 after surgery, and pain and swelling were assessed. Data were analysed using ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests. The CHX and HP groups demonstrated significantly lower mean pain scores compared to the control group on days 3 (P = 0.021, P = 0.033) and 7 (P = 0.002, P = 0.017). Regarding the difference in swelling from baseline (before surgery) on each follow-up day, the CHX and HP groups showed significantly less swelling compared to the control group on days 1 (P = 0.023, P = 0.012), 3 (P = 0.007, P = 0.001), and 7 (P = 0.002, P = 0.018). Moreover, the CHX and HP groups demonstrated significantly lower mean swelling changes from baseline compared to PI: CHX vs PI on day 7 (P = 0.032), HP vs PI on day 1 (P = 0.037). In conclusion, chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide solutions are highly beneficial options for socket irrigation following mandibular third molar surgery. This study showed a more prominent reduction in pain and swelling with chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide solutions compared to povidone-iodine solution.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 683
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[21]  
Requena-Calla Silvana, 2016, J Clin Exp Dent, V8, pe160, DOI 10.4317/jced.52444
[22]   Efficacy of Chlorhexidine after Oral Surgery Procedures on Wound Healing: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Romero-Olid, Maria de Nuria ;
Bucataru, Elena ;
Ramos-Garcia, Pablo ;
Gonzalez-Moles, Miguel Angel .
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (10)
[23]  
Sruthy TV, 2022, J Contemp Dent Pract, V23, P733
[24]   Management of Impacted Third Molars [J].
Synan, William ;
Stein, Kyle .
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 32 (04) :519-559
[25]   The efficacy of chlorhexidine gel in the prevention of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Teshome, Amare .
BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2017, 17
[26]  
Ulkur Feyza, 2013, Eur J Dent, V7, P352, DOI 10.4103/1305-7456.115420
[27]   Does Retaining Third Molars Result in the Development of Pathology Over Time? A Systematic Review [J].
Vandeplas, Cedric ;
Vranckx, Myrthel ;
Hekner, Dominique ;
Politis, Constantinus ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 78 (11) :1892-1908