Measuring decision aid effectiveness for end-of-life care: A systematic review

被引:3
作者
Hughes, M. Courtney [1 ]
Vernon, Erin [2 ]
Egwuonwu, Chinenye [1 ]
Afolabi, Oluwatoyosi [1 ]
机构
[1] Northern Illinois Univ, Sch Hlth Studies, Wirtz Hall 209, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
[2] Seattle Univ, Dept Econ, Pigott 522, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
来源
PEC INNOVATION | 2024年 / 4卷
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
End-of-life care; Decision aids; Systematic review; Advance care planning; Palliative care; Dying; COMPUTER-PROGRAM; CANCER; COMMUNICATION; DISEASE; GOALS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100273
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To systematically review research analyzing the effectiveness of decision aids for end-of-life care, including how researchers specifically measure decision aid success. Methods: We conducted a systematic review synthesizing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods study results using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Four databases were searched through February 18, 2023. Inclusion criteria required articles to evaluate end-of-life care decision aids. The review is registered under PROSPERO (#CRD42023408449). Results: A total of 715 articles were initially identified, with 43 meeting the inclusion criteria. Outcome measures identified included decisional conflict, less aggressive care desired, knowledge improvements, communication improvements, tool satisfaction, patient anxiety and well-being, and less aggressive care action completed. The majority of studies reported positive outcomes especially when the decision aid development included International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Conclusion: Research examining end of life care decision aid use consistently reports positive outcomes. Innovation: This review presents data that can guide the next generation of decision aids for end-of-life care, namely using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards in developing tools and showing which tools are effective for helping to prevent the unnecessary suffering that can result when patients' dying preferences are unknown.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   A mixed methods analysis of patients' advance care planning values in outpatient oncology: Person-Centered Oncologic Care and Choices (P-COCC) [J].
Agarwal, Rajiv ;
Shuk, Elyse ;
Romano, Danielle ;
Genoff, Margaux ;
Li, Yuelin ;
O'Reilly, Eileen M. ;
Breitbart, William ;
Volandes, Angelo E. ;
Epstein, Andrew S. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (03) :1109-1119
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Healthy People 2020 Midcourse Review
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, What Are Palliative Care and Hospice Care?
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Interview with World Bank and Honorable William Agyapong Quaittoo
[5]   Implementing "Patient-Centered Care": A Revolutionary Change in Health Care Delivery [J].
Applegate, William B. ;
Ouslander, Joseph G. ;
Kuchel, George A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2018, 66 (10) :1863-1865
[6]   "There were more decisions and more options than just yes or no": Evaluating a decision aid for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers [J].
Bakitas, Marie ;
Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas ;
Jackson, Lisa ;
Frost, Jennifer ;
Bishop, Margaret F. ;
Li, Zhongze .
PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2017, 15 (01) :44-56
[7]   The status quo bias and decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment [J].
Breslin, Jonathan .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 190 (09) :E265-E267
[8]   Communication in palliative care: talking about the end of life, before the end of life [J].
Brighton, Lisa Jane ;
Bristowe, Katherine .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 92 (1090) :466-470
[9]   Evaluation of the CPR video decision aid with patients with end stage renal disease [J].
Brown, Cherie Kapell ;
Kryworuchko, Jennifer ;
Martin, Wanda .
BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 19
[10]   A systematic review of effectiveness of decision aids to assist older patients at the end of life [J].
Cardona-Morrell, Magnolia ;
Benfatti-Olivato, Gustavo ;
Jansen, Jesse ;
Turner, Robin M. ;
Fajardo-Pulido, Diana ;
Hillman, Ken .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (03) :425-435