Cost-Effectiveness of Personalised Nutrition in Adults With Overweight and Obesity: PREVENTOMICS Studies in Poland and the UK

被引:0
作者
Galekop, Milanne Maria Johanna [1 ]
Calder, Philip C. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Baker, Ella J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Goralska, Joanna [5 ]
Razny, Urszula [5 ]
Malczewska-Malec, Malgorzata [5 ]
Uyl-de Groot, Carin A. [1 ]
Redekop, William Ken [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, Sch Human Dev & Hlth, Southampton, England
[3] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Southampton Biomed Res Ctr, Southampton, England
[4] Univ Southampton, Southampton, England
[5] Jagiellonian Univ, Chair Clin Biochem, Dept Clin Biochem Genet & Nutrigen, Med Coll, Krakow, Poland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; obesity; overweight; personalised nutrition; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; ECONOMIC-MODELS; HEALTH; IMPACT; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; TECHNOLOGIES; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1111/jhn.70071
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
BackgroundWe assessed the cost-effectiveness of personalised nutrition in adults with overweight/obesity in Poland and the United Kingdom (UK) using the results of two randomised controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsThe 4-month RCTs compared three interventions: personalised plan (PP) plus behavioural change (PP+B), PP only, and a control. Outcomes included body mass index (BMI), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs (2020 British pounds). A Markov model estimated lifetime cost-effectiveness. Different sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsParticipants were randomised to PP+B, PP, and control groups in Poland (n = 89, n = 88, n = 88) and the UK (n = 20, n = 19, n = 15). Comparing BMI reductions of PP+B and PP with control in both countries showed no significant differences, but wide confidence intervals (CIs) were observed (e.g., PP+B vs. control-Poland: -0.20, 95% CI: -0.86, 0.45 kg/m2; UK: -0.80, 95% CI: -1.60, 0.00 kg/m2). Lifetime analysis suggested potential cost-effectiveness for PP+B in Poland (20,404 pound per QALY gain), and for PP+B (13,006 pound per QALY) and PP (12,222 pound per QALY) in the UK, since these figures were lower than the willingness-to-pay thresholds (34,000 pound in Poland and 20,000 pound in the UK). PP in Poland was dominated by control, but sensitivity analyses suggested potential cost-effectiveness.ConclusionsThe PREVENTOMICS interventions may offer a cost-effective approach to reduce weight and avoid its related complications in both countries. Future studies should be larger and/or longer to reduce uncertainty about effectiveness. Clinical Trial Registration Numbers: Poland ISRCTN51509551 and the UK ISRCTN46063864.ConclusionsThe PREVENTOMICS interventions may offer a cost-effective approach to reduce weight and avoid its related complications in both countries. Future studies should be larger and/or longer to reduce uncertainty about effectiveness. Clinical Trial Registration Numbers: Poland ISRCTN51509551 and the UK ISRCTN46063864.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System, 2021, Health Technology Assessment Guidelines. Medical Products. Part I. Devices for Prophylactic and Therapeutic Use, P1
[2]   The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: new results from the UKPDS (UKPDS 84) [J].
Alva, M. L. ;
Gray, A. ;
Mihaylova, B. ;
Leal, J. ;
Holman, R. R. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2015, 32 (04) :459-466
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Purchasing Power Parities (PPP) (Indicator), DOI DOI 10.1787/1290EE5A-EN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, NICE health technology evaluations: the manual
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Health at a Glance 2019, DOI [DOI 10.1787/4DD50C09-EN, 10.1787/4dd50c09-en]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, IDF CONS WORLDW DEF
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Managing overweight and obesity in adults. Systematic evidence review from the obesity expert panel
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Inflation (Core CPI) (indicator), DOI DOI 10.1787/EEE82-6E-EN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2022, PREVENTOMICS FIN C S
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Exchange rates, DOI DOI 10.1787/037ED317-EN