How does performance feedback affect green innovation in enterprises?

被引:0
作者
Chen, Min [1 ]
Wang, Yuandi [2 ]
Zeng, Longji [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Business, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Publ Affairs, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Xiangtan, Peoples R China
关键词
Green innovation; Performance feedback; Performance deficit; Performance surplus; Government subsidy; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; PRODUCT INNOVATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; RISK-TAKING; SEARCH; ASPIRATION; PRESSURES; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1108/BJM-12-2024-0829
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeGreen innovation serves as a pivotal strategy to achieve a win-win situation between economic development and environmental protection. While performance feedback plays a crucial role in strategic decision-making, its influence on green innovation decisions remains unclear. This paper aims to explore the impact and contextual mechanisms of different performance feedback states on green innovation.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis was conducted using a two-way fixed effects regression model based on panel data from Chinese listed manufacturing firms spanning the period from 2010 to 2021.FindingsThe results revealed that performance feedback significantly affected green innovation. Specifically, performance deficit exhibited an inverted U-shaped relationship with both the quantity and quality of enterprise green innovation, while performance surplus demonstrated a U-shaped relationship. Furthermore, government subsidy played a significant, moderating positive role in the relationship between the two.Originality/valueDrawing on the BTF and DCT, this paper provides new insight into how different performance feedback states shape green innovation. This paper contributes to the BTF and DCT literature.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[51]  
Wang J., 2021, RD Management, V33, P15, DOI DOI 10.13581/J.CNKI.RDM.20200897
[52]  
Wang NN, 2023, Journal of Information Economics, V1, P65, DOI [10.58567/jie01020005, 10.58567/jie01020005, DOI 10.58567/JIE01020005]
[53]   A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM [J].
WERNERFELT, B .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1984, 5 (02) :171-180
[54]  
[吴建祖 Wu Jianzu], 2021, [科学学与科学技术管理, Science of Science and Management of S.& T.], V42, P122
[55]   Resources, Aspirations, and Emerging Multinationals [J].
Xie, En ;
Huang, Yuanyuan ;
Peng, Mike W. ;
Zhuang, Guijun .
JOURNAL OF LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATIONAL STUDIES, 2016, 23 (02) :144-161
[56]  
Xie X.M., 2021, J. Manag. World, V1, P128, DOI [DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2021.0009, 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2021.0009]
[57]   DEVIANT VERSUS ASPIRATIONAL RISK TAKING: THE EFFECTS OF PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK ON BRIBERY EXPENDITURE AND R&D INTENSITY [J].
Xu, Dean ;
Zhou, Kevin Zheng ;
Du, Fei .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 62 (04) :1226-1251
[58]   Does green finance promote green innovation? Evidence from China [J].
Xu, Xiaohui .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (10) :27948-27964
[59]   Financial performance feedback, institutional ownership and green innovation: evidence from China [J].
Yang, Jiayi ;
Chen, Xiafei .
CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2024, 18 (02) :526-549
[60]   Green entrepreneurship and SME performance: the moderating effect of firm age [J].
Yin, Chenli ;
Paz Salmador, Maria ;
Li, Dan ;
Begona Lloria, M. .
INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (01) :255-275