Predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models in InsightRX® for model-informed precision dosing for Cefepime

被引:0
作者
Koenig, Christina [1 ,2 ]
Kuti, Joseph L. [1 ]
Fratoni, Andrew J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hartford Hosp, Ctr Antiinfect Res & Dev, 80 Seymour St, Hartford, CT 06102 USA
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Intens Care Med, Hamburg, Germany
来源
PHARMACOTHERAPY | 2025年 / 45卷 / 07期
关键词
cefepime; model-informed precision dosing; population pharmacokinetic models; CLEARANCE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/phar.70029
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) is a promising tool used to ensure therapeutic antimicrobial concentrations. Model selection and sampling strategy might lead to different pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimates. Herein, we assess the predictive performance for cefepime PK in two models implemented within the InsightRX software using differing sampling approaches. Methods: Historic cefepime PK data and individual Bayesian estimates in predominantly critically ill patients, some of whom had extracorporeal support, served as the reference standard. Two population PK models (A; B) were evaluated using four sampling scenarios: (i) trough only, (ii) midpoint only, (iii) trough + midpoint, and (iv) peak + midpoint + trough. The median prediction error (MPE) and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) were calculated for clearance (CL) and volume of central compartment (V-c). Predicted categorical achievement of >= 70% time that the free drug concentration was greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration [fT>MIC(8/16mg/L)] was compared. Results: MAPE and MPE for CL and V-c resulted in variability that was dependent on model and sampling strategy. Both models' overall MPE and MAPE for CL were <+/- 20 and <30% for all tested scenarios, respectively, with a low MPE of -2.4% to 4.4% on CL for sampling scenario 4. For V-c, MPE and MAPE were >+/- 20 and >30% for the majority of test scenarios across both models, respectively. When excluding patients with extracorporeal support, MPE/MAPE for V-c decreased to 3.7-4.8/23.3%-34.5% and -7.9-2.5/25.2%-29.6% for model A and B, respectively. Using each model and sampling scheme, only four patients had discordant predicted achievement of >= 70% fT>MIC(8/16mg/L). Conclusions: These two population PK models and all sampling scenarios demonstrated acceptable prediction of cefepime PK parameters and pharmacodynamic exposures; therefore, they demonstrated suitability for utilizing MIPD for cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 413
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment in Critically Ill Patients on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy [J].
Al-Shaer, Mohammad H. ;
Philpott, Carolyn D. ;
Droege, Christopher A. ;
Courter, Joshua D. ;
Healy, Daniel P. ;
Droege, Molly E. ;
Ernst, Neil E. ;
Mueller, Eric W. ;
Peloquin, Charles A. .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 65 (06)
[2]   Meropenem, Cefepime, and Piperacillin Protein Binding in Patient Samples [J].
Al-Shaer, Mohammad H. ;
Alghamdi, Wael A. ;
Graham, Emily ;
Peloquin, Charles A. .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2020, 42 (01) :129-132
[3]  
AlShaer MH., 2020, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V64
[4]  
AlShaer MH., 2022, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V1
[5]   Population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analyses to identify a rational empirical dosing strategy for cefepime in critically ill patients [J].
An, Guohua ;
Creech, C. Buddy ;
Wu, Nan ;
Nation, Roger L. ;
Gu, Kenan ;
Nalbant, Demet ;
Jimenez-Truque, Natalia ;
Fissell, William ;
Patel, Pratish C. ;
Fishbane, Nicholas ;
Watanabe, Amy ;
Rolsma, Stephanie ;
Kirkpatrick, Carl M. J. ;
Landersdorfer, Cornelia B. ;
Winokur, Patricia .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 78 (06) :1460-1470
[6]   Adequacy of cefepime concentrations in the early phase of critical illness: A case for precision pharmacotherapy [J].
Barreto, Erin F. ;
Chang, Jack ;
Bjergum, Matthew W. ;
Gajic, Ognjen ;
Jannetto, Paul J. ;
Mara, Kristin C. ;
Meade, Laurie A. ;
Rule, Andrew D. ;
Vollmer, Kathryn J. ;
Scheetz, Marc H. .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2023, 43 (11) :1112-1120
[7]   Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics, Antibacterial Target Attainment, and Estimated Probability of Neurotoxicity in Critically Ill Patients [J].
Bilal, Muhammad ;
Zoller, Michael ;
Fuhr, Uwe ;
Jaehde, Ulrich ;
Ullah, Sami ;
Liebchen, Uwe ;
Buesker, Soeren ;
Zander, Johannes ;
Babouee Flury, Baharak ;
Taubert, Max .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 67 (07)
[8]   Cefepime neurotoxicity: thresholds and risk factors. A retrospective cohort study [J].
Boschung-Pasquier, L. ;
Atkinson, A. ;
Kastner, L. K. ;
Banholzer, S. ;
Haschke, M. ;
Buetti, N. ;
Furrer, D., I ;
Hauser, C. ;
Jent, P. ;
Que, Y. A. ;
Furrer, H. ;
Flury, B. Babouee .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2020, 26 (03) :333-339
[9]   Research priorities towards precision antibiotic therapy to improve patient care [J].
Bulman, Zackery P. ;
Wicha, Sebastian G. ;
Nielsen, Elisabet, I ;
Lenhard, Justin R. ;
Nation, Roger L. ;
Theuretzbacher, Ursula ;
Derendorf, Hartmut ;
Tangden, Thomas ;
Zeitlinger, Markus ;
Landersdorfer, Cornelia B. ;
Bulitta, Juergen B. ;
Friberg, Lena E. ;
Li, Jian ;
Tsuji, Brian T. .
LANCET MICROBE, 2022, 3 (10) :E795-E802
[10]   Population pharmacokinetics and dosing simulations of cefepime in septic shock patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy [J].
Carlier, Mieke ;
Taccone, Fabio S. ;
Beumier, Majorie ;
Seyler, Lucie ;
Cotton, Frederic ;
Jacobs, Frederique ;
Roberts, Jason A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2015, 46 (04) :413-419