Reconceptualizing Patient-reported Outcomes Measures in the Australian Breast Device Registry

被引:0
作者
Herbert, Dilinie [1 ]
Ahern, Susannah [1 ]
Walker, Melanie [2 ]
Farrell, Gillian [3 ]
Hopper, Ingrid [4 ]
Ruseckaite, Rasa [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Alfred Hlth, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Alfred Hlth, Gen Med Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
MEASURES PROMS; RECONSTRUCTION; SURGERY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000006685
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:The Australian Breast Device Registry (ABDR) is a clinical quality registry that monitors the long-term safety and performance of breast devices, including breast implants, tissue expanders, and matrix/mesh. A 5-question BREAST-Q Implant Surveillance questionnaire was captured with the primary aim of identifying poorly performing devices in women undergoing cosmetic or reconstructive breast procedures from 2017 to 2021. Poor response rates limited the ability to achieve this aim. Higher patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) completion rates were seen with reconstructive procedures. In light of this, we decided to reconceptualize the ABDR PROM program. The aim of this study was to determine the most acceptable scales for inclusion for reconstructive patients in the ABDR.Methods:A qualitative acceptability study was undertaken to seek the views of women and surgeons regarding appropriate scales from a selection of BREAST-Q instruments for a new PROM program that focused on reconstructive procedures. Data were collected via semistructured interviews, and interview transcripts were reviewed and coded thematically.Results:Eleven women who had undergone breast reconstruction surgery and 5 surgeons were interviewed. The overall preferred BREAST-Q scales were "psychosocial well-being" and "satisfaction with breasts," with recommendations to be initially administered at 6, 12, and 24 months following breast reconstruction surgery.Conclusions:The reconceptualized PROM program addresses outcomes important to women following breast reconstruction surgery. By changing to a more targeted, reliable cohort and broadening the ABDR PROM outcomes, the new program will be better able to inform enhancements in clinical care.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ahern S., 2022, The Australian Breast Device Registry 2021 annual report
[2]  
Ahern S., 2023, The Australian Breast Device Registry 2022 annual report
[3]   Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction - Two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study [J].
Atisha, Dunya ;
Alderman, Amy K. ;
Lowery, Julie C. ;
Kuhn, Latoya E. ;
Davis, Jenny ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (06) :1019-1028
[4]   Long-term active surveillance of implantable medical devices: an analysis of factors determining whether current registries are adequate to expose safety and efficacy problems [J].
Banerjee, Samprit ;
Campbell, Bruce ;
Rising, Josh ;
Coukell, Allan ;
Sedrakyan, Art .
BMJ SURGERY INTERVENTIONS & HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 1 (01)
[5]   Comparing 200,000 Breast Implants and 85,000 Patients over Four National Breast Implant Registries [J].
Becherer, Babette E. ;
Hopper, Ingrid ;
Cooter, Rodney D. ;
Couturaud, Benoit ;
von Fritschen, Uwe ;
Mullen, Erin ;
Perks, A. Graeme B. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Stark, Birgit ;
Mureau, Marc A. M. ;
Rakhorst, Hinne A. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 152 (02) :307-318
[6]   Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking [J].
Begum, Husna ;
Vishwanath, Swarna ;
Merenda, Michelle ;
Tacey, Mark ;
Dean, Nicola ;
Elder, Elisabeth ;
Mureau, Marc ;
Bezic, Ron ;
Carter, Pamela ;
Cooter, Rodney D. ;
Deva, Anand ;
Earnest, Arul ;
Higgs, Michael ;
Klein, Howard ;
Magnusson, Mark ;
Moore, Colin ;
Rakhorst, Hinne ;
Saunders, Christobel ;
Stark, Birgit ;
Hopper, Ingrid .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (08)
[7]   Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes Reporting in Breast Reconstruction A Scoping Literature Review [J].
Biswas, Sonali ;
Mullikin, Alexandria ;
Phillips, Brett T. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (05) :501-505
[8]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V2, P57, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706PQ063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[9]   Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
COUNSELLING & PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01) :37-47
[10]   What can "thematic analysis" offer health and wellbeing researchers? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES ON HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, 2014, 9