Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded in Veterans With Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Severe Mental Illness

被引:0
作者
Brown, Wilson J. [1 ]
Wojtalik, Jessica A. [2 ]
Babb, Zachary A. [1 ]
Zampogna, Alyssa M. [1 ]
Pan, Deyu [3 ]
Grubaugh, Anouk L. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Behrend Coll, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, 4701 Coll Dr, Erie, PA 16563 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Jack Joseph & Morton Mandel Sch Appl Social Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Penn State Univ Wilkes Barre, Rehabil & Human Serv, Dallas, PA USA
[4] Ralph H Johnson Vet Adm Hlth Care Syst, Charleston, SC USA
[5] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Charleston, SC USA
关键词
posttraumatic stress disorder; severe mental illness; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded; confirmatory factor analysis; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; BPRS-E; PTSD; TRAUMA; METAANALYSIS; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1037/prj0000648
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and comorbid severe mental illness (SMI) are often underserved and undertreated. Empirical validation of commonly used measures of psychiatric symptoms in clinical practice, such as the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded (BPRS-E), is warranted in this vulnerable population. As such, this study sought to validate the factor structure and examine the psychometric properties of the BPRS-E among Veterans with comorbid PTSD and SMI. Methods: The study sample included 126 Veterans with comorbid PTSD and SMI recruited for a larger randomized controlled trial. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to compare the fit of five potential factor structures. Construct validity was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the four-factor model with 12 core items and the five-factor model with 15 items demonstrated a satisfactory fit. Construct validity evidence was provided for the BPRS-E total score via a moderate correlation with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, as well as weak but significant correlations with the Beck Depression Inventory and Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: This study is the first to examine the factor structure of the BPRS-E for individuals with PTSD and SMI. Our results support the BPRS-E as a reliable and valid assessment of psychiatric symptoms in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 170
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890420249.dsm-iv-tr, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890420249.DSM-IV-TR]
[2]   The Hamilton depression rating scale: Has the gold standard become a lead weight? [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Ryder, AG ;
Schuller, DR ;
Marshall, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (12) :2163-2177
[3]  
Beck A. T., 1996, BECK DEPRESSION INVE
[4]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CLINICIAN-ADMINISTERED PTSD SCALE [J].
BLAKE, DD ;
WEATHERS, FW ;
NAGY, LM ;
KALOUPEK, DG ;
GUSMAN, FD ;
CHARNEY, DS ;
KEANE, TM .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 1995, 8 (01) :75-90
[5]   Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist (PCL) [J].
Blanchard, EB ;
JonesAlexander, J ;
Buckley, TC ;
Forneris, CA .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1996, 34 (08) :669-673
[7]   Development and Validation of a Measure of PTSD-Related Psychosocial Functional Impairment: The Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning [J].
Bovin, Michelle J. ;
Black, Shimrit K. ;
Rodriguez, Paola ;
Lunney, Carole A. ;
Kleiman, Sarah E. ;
Weathers, Frank W. ;
Schnurr, Paula P. ;
Spira, James ;
Keane, Terence M. ;
Marx, Brian P. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2018, 15 (02) :216-229
[8]  
Burlingame G.M., 2006, Psychological Services, V32, P77, DOI [10, 10.1037/1541-1559.3.2.77, DOI 10.1037/1541-1559.3.2.77]
[9]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[10]   Posttraumatic stress disorder with secondary psychotic features (PTSD-SP): Diagnostic and treatment challenges [J].
Compean, Ebele ;
Hamner, Mark .
PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 88 :265-275