Differential evolution based on two-stage mutation strategy and multi-stage parameter control

被引:0
作者
Xu, Huarong [1 ]
Lin, Shengke [1 ]
Zhang, Zhiyu [1 ]
Deng, Qianwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ Technol, Coll Comp & Informat Engn, Xiamen 361024, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Differential evolution; Piecewise parameter control; Diversity protection; Opposition based learning; PHOTOVOLTAIC MODELS; ALGORITHM; IDENTIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; MECHANISM; ENSEMBLE; PV/T;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113387
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm is an advanced evolutionary method for tackling global optimization challenges, yet designing effective parameter control generation methods and mutation strategies remains a significant challenge. In response, this paper introduces a differential evolution based on Two-Stage Mutation Strategy and Multi-Stage Parameter Control (TSMS-DE). Firstly, a multi-stage parameter control is proposed, in the early stage, a larger step size is used to enhance exploration, in the mid stage, the scaling factor is dynamically adjusted based on individual ranking, and in the late stage, a Cauchy distribution is applied to improve parameter adaptability. Secondly, an external archive optimization method utilizing a Two-Stage Mutation Strategy is developed to effectively eliminate individuals with suboptimal fitness values, ensuring the archive consistently retains high-quality individuals. Third, TSMS-DE employs an Opposite-Based Learning Strategy to generate sample points in the solution space, enabling more comprehensive coverage of the search space and enhancing overall search performance. We conducted comparative experiments on 100 benchmark test suites from the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) competitions, including CEC2013, CEC2014, CEC2017 and CEC2022. In order to rigorously evaluate the performance of the algorithms, statistical validation was carried out using a variety of tests. Compared to several advanced Differential Evolution variants and heuristic algorithms, the results demonstrate that our algorithm exhibits significant advantages in convergence, diversity, and accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Exponential distribution optimizer (EDO): a novel math-inspired algorithm for global optimization and engineering problems [J].
Abdel-Basset, Mohamed ;
El-Shahat, Doaa ;
Jameel, Mohammed ;
Abouhawwash, Mohamed .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2023, 56 (09) :9329-9400
[2]   A review on recent development for the design and packaging of hybrid photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) solar systems [J].
Abdelrazik, Ahmed S. ;
Al-Sulaiman, F. A. ;
Saidur, R. ;
Ben-Mansour, R. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 95 :110-129
[3]  
Ahrari A., 2022, PROBLEM DEFINITIONS
[4]  
Awad NH, 2017, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P372, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2017.7969336
[5]   Non-Iterative Methods for the Extraction of the Single-Diode Model Parameters of Photovoltaic Modules: A Review and Comparative Assessment [J].
Batzelis, Efstratios .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (03)
[6]   A Version of NL-SHADE-RSP Algorithm with Midpoint for CEC 2022 Single Objective Bound Constrained Problems [J].
Biedrzycki, Rafal ;
Arabas, Jaroslaw ;
Warchulski, Eryk .
2022 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2022,
[7]  
Brest J, 2014, 2014 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION (SDE), P73
[8]  
Brest J, 2020, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT
[9]   Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: A comparative study on numerical benchmark problems [J].
Brest, Janez ;
Greiner, Saso ;
Boskovic, Borko ;
Mernik, Marjan ;
Zumer, Vijern .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2006, 10 (06) :646-657
[10]  
Brest J, 2017, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P1311, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2017.7969456