Implementing generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: A systematic review of case studies

被引：0

作者：

Belkina, Marina ^{[1
]}

Daniel, Scott ^{[2
]}

Nikolic, Sasha ^{[3
]}

Haque, Rezwanul ^{[4
]}

Lyden, Sarah ^{[5
]}

Neal, Peter ^{[1
]}

Grundy, Sarah ^{[1
]}

Hassan, Ghulam M. ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] University of New South Wales, Australia

[2] University of Technology Sydney, Australia

[3] University of Wollongong, Australia

[4] University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia

[5] University of Tasmania, Australia

[6] University of Western Australia, Australia

来源：

Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence | 2025年 / 8卷

关键词：

Case study; Education; GenAI; Generative AI; Implementation; University;

D O I：

10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100407

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The introduction of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, like ChatGPT, into higher education heralds a transformative era, reshaping instructional methods, enhancing student support systems, and redefining the educational landscape. Recent literature reviews on GenAI highlight a lack of focus on how these tools are being practically implemented in educational settings. Addressing this gap, the present study systematically examines empirical case studies that demonstrate the integration of GenAI into teaching and learning in higher education, offering actionable insights and guidance for academic practice. We conducted a search of relevant databases and identified 21 empirical studies that met our inclusion criteria. The selected studies cover a diverse range of disciplines, locations, types of participants (from first-year students to postgraduates and academics), and a variety of methodologies. We classified the selected publications based on the pedagogic theory of Laurillard's Conversational Framework (LCF) and the Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) framework. We also synthesized definitions from selected empirical studies and recent research exploring Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in the age of GenAI, providing a comprehensive understanding of GenAI-TPACK factors. Limitations and future research opportunities are also discussed. The paper concludes by providing a GenAI-TPACK diagram to guide educators in effectively incorporating GenAI tools into their teaching practices, ensuring responsible and impactful use in higher education. © 2025 The Authors

引用

共 62 条

[41]

Nikolic S., Daniel S., Haque R., Belkina M., Hassan G.M., Grundy S., Sandison C., ChatGPT versus engineering education assessment: A multidisciplinary and multi-institutional benchmarking and analysis of this generative artificial intelligence tool to investigate assessment integrity, European Journal of Engineering Education, 48, 4, pp. 559-614, (2023)

[42]

Nikolic S., Sandison C., Haque R., Daniel S., Grundy S., Belkina M., Neal P., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: An updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 1-28, (2024)

[43]

Nikolic S., Suesse T.F., Grundy S., Haque R., Lyden S., Hassan G.M., Lal S., Laboratory learning objectives: Ranking objectives across the cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains within engineering, European Journal of Engineering Education, 49, 3, pp. 454-473, (2024)

[44]

Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., Moher D., The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, 372, (2021)

[45]

Park Y., Doo M.Y., Role of AI in blended learning: A systematic literature review, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25, pp. 164-196, (2024)

[46]

Pitso T., Post-COVID-19 higher learning: Towards Telagogy, A Web-based learning experience, IAFOR J. Edu., 11, pp. 39-59, (2023)

[47]

Puentedura R.R., As we may teach: Educational technology, from theory into practice, Apple, (2009)

[48]

Qureshi B., ChatGPT in Computer science curriculum assessment: An analysis of its Successes and Shortcomings, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Conference on e-Society, e-Learning and e-Technologies, <conf-loc>, Portsmouth, <country>United Kingdom</country>, </conf-loc>, (2023)

[49]

Rudolph J., Tan S., Tan S., ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?, J. appl. learn. teach., 6, 1, pp. 342-363, (2023)

[50]

Silitonga L.M., Hawanti S., Aziez F., Furqon M., Zain D.S.M., Anjarani S., Et al., The impact of AI chatbot-based learning on students' motivation in English writing classroom, Paper presented at the innovative technologies and learning, Cham, (2023)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →