Multilevel Monte Carlo Simulation Model for Air Pollution Index Prediction of a Smart Network

被引:0
作者
Hassan, Mustafa Hamid [1 ]
Mostafa, Salama A. [2 ]
Ghazali, Rozaida [2 ]
Saringat, Mohd Zainuri [2 ]
Husaini, Noor Aida [3 ]
Mustapha, Aida [4 ]
Jubair, Mohammed Ahmed [1 ]
Hariz, Hussein Muhi
机构
[1] Imam Jaafar Al Sadiq Univ, Coll Informat Technol, Al Muthanna 66002, Iraq
[2] Univ Tun Hussin Onn Malaysia, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Johor Baharu 84600, Malaysia
[3] Tunku Abdul Rahman Univ Management & Technol, Fac Comp & Informat Technol, Jalan Genting Kelang, Kuala Lumpur 53300, Malaysia
[4] Univ Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Fac Appl Sci & Technol, Johor Baharu 84500, Malaysia
来源
RECENT ADVANCES ON SOFT COMPUTING AND DATA MINING, SCDM 2024 | 2024年 / 1078卷
关键词
Air quality prediction; Air Pollution Index (API); Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM); Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS); RISK-ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-66965-1_13
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Air pollution has become a significant environmental challenge in the 21st century due to widespread industrialization and urbanization worldwide. Effectively reducing it requires precise predictions of air quality. However, existing methods for predicting the Air Pollution Index (API) fail to effectively model short-term variables' dependencies and mostly neglect spatial correlations. Given these limitations, the statistical method emerges as the most suitable choice. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) is one of the best short-term time series prediction statistical approaches. This paper proposes a Multilevel Monte Carlo Simulation (MLMCS) model based on the MCS model for forecasting the API. The study covers the analysis of an air pollution dataset that includes the API and ambient air quality of ten locations in Beijing, China. The results show that the MLMCS improves the performance of API prediction compared to the MCS. The MLMCS model has the highest accuracy of 86.45% and the lowest computational time of 3.43 s compared to the MCS model's accuracy of 82.90% and computational time of 7.5 s.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 135
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, P 12 INT C STRUCT SA
[2]   Air Pollution Risk Assessment Using a Hybrid Fuzzy Intelligent Probability-Based Approach: Mine Blasting Dust Impacts [J].
Bakhtavar, Ezzeddin ;
Hosseini, Shahab ;
Hewage, Kasun ;
Sadiq, Rehan .
NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (03) :2607-2627
[3]   Methods used for handling and quantifying model uncertainty of artificial neural network models for air pollution forecasting [J].
Cabaneros, Sheen Mclean ;
Hughes, Ben .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2022, 158
[4]   Probabilistic permanent fault displacement hazard via Monte Carlo simulation and its consideration for the probabilistic risk assessment of buried continuous steel pipelines [J].
Cheng, Yin ;
Akkar, Sinan .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2017, 46 (04) :605-620
[5]   Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM2.5 pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation [J].
Feng, Xiao ;
Li, Qi ;
Zhu, Yajie ;
Hou, Junxiong ;
Jin, Lingyan ;
Wang, Jingjie .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 107 :118-128
[6]   Development of an AI Model to Measure Traffic Air Pollution from Multisensor and Weather Data [J].
Hai-Bang Ly ;
Lu Minh Le ;
Luong Van Phi ;
Viet-Hung Phan ;
Van Quan Tra ;
Binh Thai Pham ;
Tien-Thinh Le ;
Derrible, Sybil .
SENSORS, 2019, 19 (22)
[7]  
Hamid Hassan M., 2022, Int J Inform Vis, V6, P1
[8]  
Hassan M.H., 2020, AUS J., V26, P1
[9]   A New Collaborative Multi-Agent Monte Carlo Simulation Model for Spatial Correlation of Air Pollution Global Risk Assessment [J].
Hassan, Mustafa Hamid ;
Mostafa, Salama A. ;
Mustapha, Aida ;
Saringat, Mohd Zainuri ;
Al-rimy, Bander Ali Saleh ;
Saeed, Faisal ;
Eljialy, A. E. M. ;
Jubair, Mohammed Ahmed .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
[10]   A Monte Carlo approach to integrating uncertainty into the levelized cost of electricity [J].
Heck, Nathaniel ;
Smith, Courtney ;
Hittinger, Eric .
Electricity Journal, 2016, 29 (03) :21-30