The value of morphological magnetic resonance imaging features combined with diffusion kurtosis imaging for predicting Ki-67 expression levels in high-grade gliomas

被引:0
作者
Wang, Ping [1 ]
Huang, Huan [2 ]
Yang, Lu [1 ]
Chen, Guangxiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp, 25 Taiping St, Luzhou 646000, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Med Univ, Dept MRI, Affiliated Tradit Chinese Med Hosp, Luzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Glioma; Ki-67; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI); nomogram; PROLIFERATION INDEX; COEFFICIENT;
D O I
10.21037/qims-24-2035
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression levels is especially crucial for developing appropriate individualized treatment plans and evaluating prognoses in patients with highgrade gliomas (HGGs). Although previous studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can preoperatively predict Ki-67 expression levels in glioma, the optimal parameters and predictive performance remain controversial. In particular, there is insufficient research on the value of morphological MRI (mMRI) features and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for the preoperative assessment of Ki-67 expression levels in HGG. This study aimed to investigate the value of combining mMRI features with DKI for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression levels in HGG. Methods: A total of 52 patients who were diagnosed with HGG by surgical pathology and who underwent conventional MRI and DKI scans were included in the study. The clinical and pathological characteristics, relative axial kurtosis (rKa), and relative fractional anisotropy (rFA) were compared between the Ki-67 highand low-expression groups in HGG. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the areas under the curve (AUCs), as well as the sensitivities and specificities, were calculated. A nomogram for the prediction of Ki-67 expression levels in HGG was developed on the basis of the pivotal parameters from the mMRI and DKI. Calibration and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the nomogram. Results: The differences in tumor grade, subventricular involvement (SVI), boundary, diffusion restriction, enhancement, rMD, rMK, rKr, and rKa between the Ki-67 high- and low-expression groups in HGG were statistically significant (P<0.05). When the mMRI and DKI parameters were employed for individual diagnostics, the rMK exhibited the highest diagnostic efficiency, with an AUC value of 0.777 and a sensitivity and specificity of 80.0% and 67.6%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the DKI model was superior to that of the mMRI model, with an AUC value of 0.834 and a sensitivity and specificity of 86.7% and 67.6%, respectively. The combination of the mMRI features and DKI yielded the optimal diagnostic performance, with an AUC value of 0.892 and a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 67.6%, respectively. The C index for the nomogram was 0.874. The calibration and decision curve analysis confirmed that there was good consistency between the probability predicted by the nomogram and the actual probability and good clinical utility. Conclusions: The combination of the mMRI and DKI is useful for noninvasive preoperative prediction of HGG Ki-67 expression levels, and the nomogram may help in clinical decision-making for HGG patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2813 / 2826
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Assessment of Ki-67 expression levels in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma using logistic regression modelling of VASARI features [J].
Bai, Liangcai ;
Jiang, Jian ;
Zhou, Junlin .
NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 47 (01)
[2]   World Health Organization 2021 Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors and Implications for Therapy for Adult-Type Gliomas A Review [J].
Berger, Tamar R. ;
Wen, Patrick Y. ;
Lang-Orsini, Melanie ;
Chukwueke, Ugonma N. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 (10) :1493-1501
[3]   Effects of signal averaging, gradient encoding scheme, and spatial resolution on diffusion kurtosis imaging: An empirical study using 7T MRI [J].
Chiang, Chia-Wen ;
Lin, Shih-Yen ;
Cho, Kuan-Hung ;
Wu, Kuo-Jen ;
Wang, Yun ;
Kuo, Li-Wei .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (05) :1593-1603
[4]   Ki-67 Labelling Index as a Predictor of Invasive Features in Thyroid Cancer: Retrospective Analysis and Implications [J].
Chowdhury, Raisa ;
Alsayegh, Raihanah ;
Forest, Veronique-Isabelle ;
Pusztaszeri, Marc Philippe ;
da Silva, Sabrina Daniela ;
Florianova, Livia ;
Payne, Richard J. .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (07) :4030-4037
[5]   Restriction Spectrum Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Assessing Proliferation Status in Rectal Carcinoma [J].
Cui, Yingying ;
Wang, Xinhui ;
Wang, Ying ;
Meng, Nan ;
Wu, Yaping ;
Shen, Yu ;
Roberts, Neil ;
Bai, Yan ;
Song, Xiaosheng ;
Shen, Guofeng ;
Guo, Yongjun ;
Guo, Jinxia ;
Wang, Meiyun .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2025, 32 (01) :201-209
[6]   Preoperative and Noninvasive Prediction of Gliomas Histopathological Grades and IDH Molecular Types Using Multiple MRI Characteristics [J].
Du, Ningfang ;
Zhou, Xiaotao ;
Mao, Renling ;
Shu, Weiquan ;
Xiao, Li ;
Ye, Yao ;
Xu, Xinxin ;
Shen, Yilang ;
Lin, Guangwu ;
Fang, Xuhao ;
Li, Shihong .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[7]   The Evolution of Ki-67 and Breast Carcinoma: Past Observations, Present Directions, and Future Considerations [J].
Finkelman, Brian S. ;
Zhang, Huina ;
Hicks, David G. ;
Turner, Bradley M. .
CANCERS, 2023, 15 (03)
[8]  
Gao AK, 2022, RADIOLOGY, V302, P652, DOI 10.1148/radiol.210820
[9]   Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in abdominal oncological setting: why and when [J].
Granata, Vincenza ;
Fusco, Roberta ;
Belli, Andrea ;
Danti, Ginevra ;
Bicci, Eleonora ;
Cutolo, Carmen ;
Petrillo, Antonella ;
Izzo, Francesco .
INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER, 2022, 17 (01)
[10]   Optimization of scan parameters to reduce acquisition time for RESOLVE-based diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) [J].
He, Yaoyao ;
Chen, Hao ;
Zhang, Huiting ;
Grimm, Robert ;
Zhao, Cecheng ;
Guo, Xiaofang ;
Liu, Yulin ;
Yuan, Zilong .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1136)