Machine Learning-Driven Adaptive Testing: An Application for the MMPI Assessment

被引:0
作者
Colledani, Daiana [1 ]
Robusto, Egidio [2 ]
Anselmi, Pasquale [2 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Fac Med & Psychol, Dept Psychol, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Philosophy Sociol Educ & Appl Psychol, Padua, Italy
关键词
CAT; countdown algorithm; decision tree; M5P; machine learning classifier algorithms; MMPI-2; model tree; regression tree; CLINICAL RC SCALES; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; PERSONALITY-ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; VERSION MMPI-2-CA; ABBREVIATED FORM; DECISION TREE; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1155/hbe2/5146188
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper aims to examine the effectiveness of machine learning classification algorithms as a strategy to overcome the limitations associated with traditional methods for developing computerized adaptive versions of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). The focus is on the three scales in the neurotic area of the instrument, namely, hypochondria, depression, and hysteria, which were administered electronically to a nonclinical sample of 383 participants. The findings indicate that a machine learning classifier based on a model tree (ML-MT) algorithm effectively handled the complex MMPI-2 scales, yielding accurate scores while noticeably reducing item administration. In particular, the ML-MT algorithm achieved item savings between 85.99% and 93.78% and produced scores that differed from those of the full-length scales by only 2.5-3.3 points. Compared to the countdown algorithm, the ML-MT algorithm proved to be significantly more efficient and accurate. Furthermore, the ML-MT scores retained their validity, as indicated by correlations with other MMPI-2 scales that were comparable to those obtained with the full-length scales (the average difference between the correlations was less than 0.10). These findings support the potential of the ML-MT algorithm as an effective method for adaptive assessment in the context of the MMPI instruments and other psychometric tools.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Enhancing Computerized Adaptive Testing with Batteries of Unidimensional Tests [J].
Anselmi, Pasquale ;
Robusto, Egidio ;
Cristante, Francesca .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2023, 47 (03) :167-182
[2]   Comparing the Ability of MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales to Detect Feigning: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Aparcero, Maria ;
Picard, Emilie H. ;
Nijdam-Jones, Alicia ;
Rosenfeld, Barry .
ASSESSMENT, 2023, 30 (03) :744-760
[3]   Data mining with decision trees and decision rules [J].
Apte, C ;
Weiss, S .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 1997, 13 (2-3) :197-210
[4]  
Ben-Porath Y., 2020, MINNESOTA MULTIPHASI
[5]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 1989, Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, V1, P18, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.1.1.18
[6]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2008, MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation
[7]   Using the MMPI-3 in Legal Settings [J].
Ben-Porath, Yossef S. ;
Heilbrun, Kirk ;
Rizzo, Madelena .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2022, 104 (02) :162-178
[8]  
Ben-Porath YS, 2012, INTERPRETING THE MMPI-2-RF, P241
[9]  
Bouckaert R. R., Choosing between two learning algorithms based on calibrated tests, P51
[10]  
Breiman L., 1984, Classification and regression trees, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315139470