Bridging the care gap: patients' needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy

被引:0
作者
van Hienen, A. R. [1 ]
Offermann, C. J. W. [2 ]
Boersma, L. J. [1 ]
Jacobs, M. J. G. [3 ]
Fijten, R. R. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, GROW Res Inst Oncol & Reprod, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol MAASTRO, Dr Tanslaan 12, NL-6229 ET Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastro Clin, Res Affairs Dept, Dr Tanslaan 12, NL-6229 ET Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Sch Econ & Management, Dept Management, Warandelaan 2, NL-5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Shared Decision Making; Patient Preference; Physicians; Neoplasms; Educational Status; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Referral and Consultation; Tertiary Care Centers; CANCER-TREATMENT; HEALTH LITERACY; SATISFACTION; PARTICIPATION; PREFERENCES; EDUCATION; ROLES; MODEL; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100897
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative process in which patients and physicians jointly determine further treatment, has been associated with numerous positive effects. However, its implementation into routine clinical practice faces challenges. In radiotherapy (RT) it may have additional challenges, since patients are referred from another oncologist, often "to undergo RT". The aim of this study is to understand patients' preferences and experiences regarding SDM at an academic RT clinic, and to identify targets for SDM implementation in RT. Materials and methods: We adapted an earlier survey sent out by the Dutch Cancer Patient Organizations Federation to fit the RT setting. The survey was distributed via letters and social media to (former) patients who had their intake between 2020 and 2022. Results: 1799 participants completed the survey, of whom 88,3% mentioned to always or often prefer SDM. 23,1% of participants reported experiencing a choice, and 50% of these participants experienced multiple options. The most commons reason for preferring SDM was bodily autonomy (n = 1114) and against SDM was wanting to decide themselves instead (n = 11). Participants with a higher educational attainment were more likely to prefer and experience SDM. Older participants were more likely to experience multiple options. Conclusion: Our findings reaffirm that most cancer patients prefer SDM, and extend these findings to RT. However, we found a large gap between patients' desire for SDM, and the SDM experienced in our RT institute. SDM implementation strategies are needed and should focus on overcoming RT-specific and patient-reported barriers and opportunities.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Towards a taxonomy of behavior change techniques for promoting shared decision making [J].
Agbadje, Titilayo Tatiana ;
Elidor, Helene ;
Perin, Milena Sia ;
Adekpedjou, Rheda ;
Legare, France .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (01)
[2]   Improving shared decision-making in a clinical obstetric ward by using the three questions intervention, a pilot study [J].
Baijens, S. W. E. ;
Huppelschoten, A. G. ;
Van Dillen, J. ;
Aarts, J. W. M. .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
[3]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[4]   Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Covvey, Jordan R. ;
Kamal, Khalid M. ;
Gorse, Erin E. ;
Mehta, Zumi ;
Dhumal, Trupti ;
Heidari, Elham ;
Rao, Deepika ;
Zacker, Christopher .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (05) :1613-1637
[5]  
Cramer H., 1946, Mathematical methods of statistics.
[6]   Prostate cancer survivors with a passive role preference in treatment decision-making are less satisfied with information received: Results from the PROFILES registry [J].
Cuypers, Maarten ;
Lamers, Romy E. D. ;
de Vries, Marieke ;
Husson, Olga ;
Kil, Paul J. M. ;
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (11) :482.e11-482.e18
[7]   Shared Decision Making in Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review [J].
Dalmia, Sanjush ;
Boele, Florien ;
Absolom, Kate ;
Brunelli, Alessandro ;
Franks, Kevin ;
Bekker, Hilary Louise ;
Pompili, Cecilia .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 114 (02) :581-590
[8]   Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science [J].
Damschroder, Laura J. ;
Aron, David C. ;
Keith, Rosalind E. ;
Kirsh, Susan R. ;
Alexander, Jeffery A. ;
Lowery, Julie C. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
[9]   Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Frosch, Dominick ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Joseph-Williams, Natalie ;
Lloyd, Amy ;
Kinnersley, Paul ;
Cording, Emma ;
Tomson, Dave ;
Dodd, Carole ;
Rollnick, Stephen ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Barry, Michael .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (10) :1361-1367
[10]   Implementing shared decision making in the NHS [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Laitner, Steve ;
Coulter, Angela ;
Walker, Emma ;
Watson, Paul ;
Thomson, Richard .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 :971-972