共 26 条
Evaluating PGT-A in patients with limited good-quality embryos: A retrospective cohort study
被引:0
作者:
Zhu, S.
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
,7
]
Hu, M.
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
,7
]
Zhu, H.
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
,7
]
Song, X.
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
,7
]
Lyu, C.
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
,7
]
Zhou, W.
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
,7
]
Ni, T.
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
,7
]
Zhang, Q.
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
,7
]
Yan, J.
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
,7
]
机构:
[1] Shandong Univ, Ctr Reprod Med, Inst Women Children & Reprod Hlth, State Key Lab Reprod Med & Offspring Hlth, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Natl Res Ctr Assisted Reprod Technol & Reprod Gene, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Reprod Endocrinol, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Technol Innovat Ctr Reprod Hlth, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Prov Clin Res Ctr Reprod Hlth, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[6] Shandong Key Lab Reprod Res & Birth Defect Prevent, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[7] Chinese Acad Med Sci 2021RU001, Res Unit Gametogenesis & Hlth ART Offspring, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy;
Limited good-quality embryos;
Cumulative live birth rate;
Live birth rate per embryo transfer;
Neonatal outcomes;
IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION;
PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS;
BLASTOCYST BIOPSY;
IMPLANTATION;
ANEUPLOIDY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114043
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
Background: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is widely used to screen for aneuploidy with the aim of improving the live birth rate. Remarkably, previous studies have focused on the effect of PGT-A on cumulative clinical outcomes in women with a good pregnancy prognosis. However, it is still unclear whether PGT-A is superior for cumulative pregnancy outcomes in patients with limited good-quality embryos. Methods: In total, 1553 patients who intended to pursue PGT-A for the first time but only obtained two or fewer good-quality embryos on day 3 after oocyte retrieval were divided into two groups: 997 in the PGT-A group and 556 in the drop-out group (i.e., decided not to undergo PGT-A due to poor embryological outcome). The main outcome measures were cumulative live birth rate per oocyte retrieval cycle and live birth rate per embryo transfer (ET) cycle. Results: After adjustment for potential confounders, the PGT-A group exhibited significantly lower cumulative rates of biochemical pregnancy [19.96 % vs. 30.22 %, p-adjusted (p-adj) < 0.001], clinical pregnancy (17.55 % vs. 23.38 %, p-adj < 0.001) and live birth (14.14 % vs. 16.19 %, p-adj = 0.005) per oocyte retrieval compared with the drop-out group. In contrast, when analysed per ET procedure, the PGT-A group showed marked improvements in rates of biochemical pregnancy (72.16 % vs. 35.50 %, p-adj < 0.001), clinical pregnancy (61.86 % vs. 26.98 %, p-adj < 0.001) and live birth (48.45 % vs. 18.26 %, p-adj < 0.001) compared with the drop-out group. No significant differences were observed in cumulative miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates, number of ETs per live birth, and neonatal outcomes between the groups. Conclusions: This retrospective study of patients with limited good-quality embryos found that the PGT-A group had a lower cumulative live birth rate per oocyte retrieval, but superior pregnancy outcomes per ET compared with the drop-out group.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文