Probabilistic risk analysis of local verification of Load Model 1 in Eurocode for soil-steel composite bridges in Sweden

被引:0
作者
Lagerkvist, Johan [1 ,2 ]
Berrocal, Carlos Gil [1 ]
Carlsson, Fredrik [2 ]
Rempling, Rasmus [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Sven Hultins Gata 6, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Swedish Transport Adm, Borlange, Sweden
关键词
soil steel composite bridges; climate reduction; probabilistic risk analysis; Monte Carlo simulations; rice formula; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; EXTRAPOLATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1177/15732487241295574
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Background: Bridges must be designed to ensure safety for all users. At the same time, the design should be performed with an appropriate risk level. In Sweden, soil-steel composite bridges (SSCB) are the most common bridge type. For SSCB, local verification of Load Model 1 in Eurocode is most often governing the design. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether the local verification of LM1 load case could be modified without decreasing the desired risk level in Eurocode. Methods: Weight in motion measurements from real traffic were extrapolated with Rice formula. Monte Carlo simulations were used to simulate the 1000-year return period event to obtain the acceptable risk level as prescribed in Eurocode. Results: The results show that the local verification of LM1 is conservative, considering the acceptable risk level in Eurocode. With a modified implementation of local verification, this paper shows that a potential saving of up to 14% in terms of economic cost and CO2-equivalents is possible. Conclusions: A modified implementation of local verification of LM1 in Eurocode for SSCB is proposed, which could represent a substantial reduction of the climate impact associated to the construction of new SSCB in Sweden.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]  
Miljmlsberedningen, 2016, SOU 2016:21, Ett klimatpolitiskt ramverk fr Sverige
[22]  
Nowak M, 2017, 14 INT PROB WORKSH, P135, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-47886-9_10, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47886-9_10]
[23]   Bridge assessment loading: a comparison of West and Central/East Europe [J].
O'Brien, Eugene J. ;
Caprani, Colin C. ;
O'Connell, Gavin J. .
BRIDGE STRUCTURES, 2006, 2 (01) :25-33
[24]   Traffic load modelling and factors influencing the accuracy of predicted extremes [J].
O'Connor, A ;
O'Brien, EJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2005, 32 (01) :270-278
[25]   Probability-based assessment of highway bridges according to the new Danish guideline [J].
O'Connor, A. ;
Enevoldsen, I. .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2009, 5 (02) :157-168
[26]   A review of probabilistic methods of assessment of load effects in bridges [J].
OBrien, E. J. ;
Schmidt, F. ;
Hajializadeh, D. ;
Zhou, X. -Y ;
Enright, B. ;
Caprani, C. C. ;
Wilson, S. ;
Sheils, E. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2015, 53 :44-56
[27]  
Pettersson L., 2014, Design of soil steel composite bridges
[28]   Automatic structural design by a set-based parametric design method [J].
Rempling, Rasmus ;
Mathern, Alexandre ;
Ramos, David Tarazona ;
Luis Fernandez, Santiago .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 108
[29]  
Rezaei A., Optimization of the design of soil-steel high profile arch using particle swarm optimization, V2021, P12
[30]   MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF RANDOM NOISE [J].
RICE, SO .
BELL SYSTEM TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1945, 24 (01) :46-156