Model Predictive Control of Quadcopter Using Physics-guided Neural Network

被引:0
作者
Hong, Seong Hyeon [1 ]
Wang, Yi [1 ]
Yu, Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Mech Engn, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Architectural Engn, State Coll, PA 16801 USA
来源
AIAA SCITECH 2022 FORUM | 2022年
关键词
TRACKING CONTROL; QUADROTOR; ATTITUDE; POSITION;
D O I
10.2514/6.2022-1730
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Nonlinear models are being utilized in MPC frameworks for UAVs because they are able to enhance control performance by precisely representing the physical system and generating more accurate prediction horizon. However, uncertainty in parameters and approximation errors associated with physics-based (PB) models could dramatically degrade MPC performance. On the other hand, data-driven models require a large amount of training data with salient representation throughout the operational range, which, however, is often difficult to obtain. To address these limitations, this research presents a new physics-guided neural network (PGN) model that adopts the RNN structure as its backbone and embeds the residuals computed by the PB models to enforce physical constraints. Thus, the proposed PGN can be trained with a smaller amount of data compared to the purely data-driven networks, and even precisely represent the system dynamics beyond the range of the training data. Numerical case study is performed to construct a PGN model to represent the quadcopter UAV, which is then employed in MPC for trajectory tracking. The PGN-MPC demonstrates better performance (tracking accuracy and robustness) in comparison to MPC based on the nominal PB model and fully-connected neural network (FCN) model.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   An Efficient Model Predictive Control Scheme for an Unmanned Quadrotor Helicopter [J].
Abdolhosseini, M. ;
Zhang, Y. M. ;
Rabbath, C. A. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2013, 70 (1-4) :27-38
[2]   Model predictive quadrotor control: attitude, altitude and position experimental studies [J].
Alexis, K. ;
Nikolakopoulos, G. ;
Tzes, A. .
IET CONTROL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 6 (12) :1812-1827
[3]  
Chen X, 2013, 2013 3RD AUSTRALIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (AUCC), P354, DOI 10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697298
[4]  
Cheng H, 2017, C IND ELECT APPL, P768, DOI 10.1109/ICIEA.2017.8282943
[5]   Nonlinear Control of Quadrotor for Point Tracking: Actual Implementation and Experimental Tests [J].
Choi, Young-Cheol ;
Ahn, Hyo-Sung .
IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, 2015, 20 (03) :1179-1192
[6]  
ElKholy H. M., 2014, M.S. thesis
[7]   Optimized Artificial Neural Network Model and Compensator in Model Predictive Control for Anomaly Mitigation [J].
Hong, Seong Hyeon ;
Cornelius, Jackson ;
Wang, Yi ;
Pant, Kapil .
JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (05)
[8]   Fault compensation by online updating of genetic algorithm-selected neural network model for model predictive control [J].
Hong, Seong Hyeon ;
Cornelius, Jackson ;
Wang, Yi ;
Pant, Kapil .
SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 1 (11)
[9]  
Kani JN, 2017, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1709.00939
[10]  
Lee BY, 2013, 2013 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS (ICCAS 2013), P1840, DOI 10.1109/ICCAS.2013.6704240