The role of AI in emergency department triage: An integrative systematic review

被引:4
作者
El Arab, Rabie Adel [1 ]
Al Moosa, Omayma Abdulaziz [1 ]
机构
[1] Almoosa Coll Hlth Sci, Alhsa, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Emergency department; Triage; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Risk stratification; Overcrowding; Predictive modeling; Natural language processing; Healthcare outcomes; Clinical decision support; ADMISSION; DECISIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104058
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) leads to delayed treatments, poor patient outcomes, and increased staff workloads. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools to optimize triage. Objective: This systematic review evaluates AI/ML-driven triage and risk stratification models in EDs, focusing on predictive performance, key predictors, clinical and operational outcomes, and implementation challenges. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore for studies on AI/ML-driven ED triage published through January 2025. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using PROBAST, with findings synthesized thematically. Results: Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria. ML-based triage models consistently outperformed traditional tools, often achieving AUCs > 0.80 for high acuity outcomes (e.g., hospital admission, ICU transfer). Key predictors included vital signs, age, arrival mode, and disease-specific markers. Incorporating free-text data via natural language processing enhances accuracy and sensitivity. Advanced ML techniques, such as gradient boosting and random forests, generally surpassed simpler models across diverse populations. Reported benefits included reduced ED overcrowding, improved resource allocation, fewer mis-triaged patients, and potential patient outcome improvements. Conclusion: AI/ML-based triage models hold substantial promise in improving ED efficiency and patient outcomes. Prospective, multi-center trials with transparent reporting and seamless electronic health record integration are essential to confirm these benefits. Implications for Clinical Practice: Integrating AI and ML into ED triage can enhance assessment accuracy and resource allocation. Early identification of high-risk patients supports better clinical decision-making, including critical care and ICU nurses, by streamlining patient transitions and reducing overcrowding. Explainable AI models foster trust and enable informed decisions under pressure. To realize these benefits, healthcare organizations must invest in robust infrastructure, provide comprehensive training for all clinical staff, and implement ethical, standardized practices that support interdisciplinary collaboration between ED and ICU teams.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[11]   A comparative study of supervised machine learning approaches to predict patient triage outcomes in hospital emergency departments [J].
Elhaj, Hamza ;
Achour, Nebil ;
Tania, Marzia Hoque ;
Aciksari, Kurtulus .
ARRAY, 2023, 17
[12]   A multidisciplinary safety briefing for acutely ill and deteriorating patients: A quality improvement project [J].
Fazzini, Brigitta ;
McGinley, Ann ;
Stewart, Carolyne .
INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 74
[13]   Using Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Hospital Admission at the Emergency Department [J].
Feretzakis, Georgios ;
Karlis, George ;
Loupelis, Evangelos ;
Kalles, Dimitris ;
Chatzikyriakou, Rea ;
Trakas, Nikolaos ;
Karakou, Eugenia ;
Sakagianni, Aikaterini ;
Tzelves, Lazaros ;
Petropoulou, Stavroula ;
Tika, Aikaterini ;
Dalainas, Ilias ;
Kaldis, Vasileios .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 8 (02) :107-116
[14]   Risk of mortality and cardiopulmonary arrest in critical patients presenting to the emergency department using machine learning and natural language processing [J].
Fernandes, Marta ;
Mendes, Ruben ;
Vieira, Susana M. ;
Leite, Francisca ;
Palos, Carlos ;
Johnson, Alistair ;
Finkelstein, Stan ;
Horng, Steven ;
Celi, Leo Anthony .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04)
[15]   Machine learning based prediction models for analyzing risk factors in patients with acute abdominal pain: a retrospective study [J].
Gan, Tian ;
Liu, Xiaochao ;
Liu, Rong ;
Huang, Jing ;
Liu, Dingxi ;
Tu, Wenfei ;
Song, Jiao ;
Cai, Pengli ;
Shen, Hexiao ;
Wang, Wei .
FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
[16]   Developing and Validating an Emergency Triage Model Using Machine Learning Algorithms with Medical Big Data [J].
Gao, ZhenZhen ;
Qi, Xuan ;
Zhang, XingTing ;
Gao, XinZhen ;
He, XinHua ;
Guo, ShuBin ;
Li, Peng .
RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2022, 15 :1545-1551
[17]   How large language model-powered conversational agents influence decision making in domestic medical triage contexts [J].
Gomez, Catalina ;
Yin, Junjie ;
Huang, Chien-Ming ;
Unberath, Mathias .
FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2024, 6
[18]   Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes for Children During Emergency Department Triage [J].
Goto, Tadahiro ;
Camargo, Carlos A., Jr. ;
Faridi, Mohammad Kamal ;
Freishtat, Robert J. ;
Hasegawa, Kohei .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (01)
[19]  
Graham SS, 2022, The Doctor and the Algorithm, P86, DOI [10.1093/OSO/9780197644461.003.0005, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780197644461.003.0005]
[20]   Emergency Department to ICU Time Is Associated With Hospital Mortality: A Registry Analysis of 14,788 Patients From Six University Hospitals in The Netherlands* [J].
Groenland, Carline N. ;
Termorshuizen, Fabian ;
Rietdijk, Wim J. R. ;
van den Brule, Judith ;
Dongelmans, Dave A. ;
de Jonge, Evert ;
de Lange, Dylan W. ;
de Smet, Anne Marie G. A. ;
de Keizer, Nicolette F. ;
Weigel, Joachim D. ;
Jewbali, Lucia S. D. ;
Boersma, Eric ;
den Uil, Corstiaan A. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (11) :1564-1571