Comparative Analysis of Economic and Environmental Trade-Offs in Alfalfa Production in China: A Case Study

被引:0
作者
Bai, Helan [1 ]
Ma, Xueni [1 ]
Lin, Huilong [1 ]
Wu, Yanqin [1 ]
Nan, Zhibiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Pastoral Agr Sci & Technol,State Key Lab Herb, Engn Res Ctr Grassland Ind,Minist Educ, Key Lab Grassland Livestock Ind Innovat,Minist Agr, Lanzhou 730020, Peoples R China
关键词
economic viability; environmental sustainability; life cycle assessment (LCA); alfalfa production systems; regional differences; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; WATER; IMPACTS; WASTE; CROPS; YIELD;
D O I
10.3390/su17104252
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plays a crucial role in the revitalization of the dairy industry and grassland agriculture in China. However, regional differences in economic and environmental performance have not been adequately specified or quantified. This study compares alfalfa production in Wuhe County (Southern China) and Ar Horqin Banner (Northern China) by integrating cost-benefit analysis (CBA) with life cycle assessment (LCA). Field data from 22 enterprises were analyzed using one ton of alfalfa hay and a net profit of CNY 10,000 as functional units, over a three-year evaluation period (2017-2019). The assessment encompassed four impact categories: primary energy demand (PED), global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), and water use (WU). The northern case systems exhibited 67.45% higher production costs but 96.99% greater profitability per ton compared to the southern case, alongside 2.13 x 10-2 greater environmental impact. Conversely, the southern case systems were less profitable and demonstrated an 18.6% higher environmental impact per CNY 10,000 net profit compared to the northern case. Regional environmental hotspots differed: fertilizer use dominated impact in the south, whereas irrigation and electricity consumption drove burdens in the north. To facilitate a sustainable transition, policymakers should implement region-specific support measures, such as ecological incentives and crop rotation schemes for the south, and water-saving technologies along with renewable energy integration for the north. Farmers and enterprises are encouraged to adopt precision input strategies and climate risk management tools, while researchers should focus on advancing adaptive breeding techniques and optimizing resource utilization. The development of a unified system that integrates economic and environmental metrics is crucial for enabling stakeholders to drive the sustainable transformation of alfalfa production.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, [No title captured]
[2]   Life cycle assessment in wastewater treatment: influence of site-oriented normalization factors, life cycle impact assessment methods, and weighting methods [J].
Bai, Shunwen ;
Wang, Xiuheng ;
Zhang, Xuedong ;
Zhao, Xinyue ;
Ren, Nanqi .
RSC ADVANCES, 2017, 7 (42) :26335-26341
[3]   OUR COMMON FUTURE - CALL FOR ACTION [J].
BRUNDTLAND, GH .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1987, 14 (04) :291-294
[4]  
Buendia E., 2019, REFINEMENT 2006 IPCC
[5]  
Carlson KM, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P63, DOI [10.1038/nclimate3158, 10.1038/NCLIMATE3158]
[6]  
Chen Xu-hao, 2022, Scientia Agricultura Sinica, V55, P3170, DOI 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.16.009
[7]  
Chengdu Yike Environmental Technology Co. Ltd., 2021, China Life Cycle Database (CLCD)
[8]  
Creech J.D., 2013, P 2013 W ALF FOR S R, P11
[9]  
customs, General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China
[10]  
[Eggleston HS. IPCC IPCC], 2006, IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories