Long-term outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective single-center study

被引:0
作者
Chen, Si [1 ]
Yang, Xiaxin [1 ]
Xu, Shujun [2 ,3 ]
Li, Baomin [4 ]
Li, Chao [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Ning [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Xue [1 ]
Wang, Xiaotang [1 ]
Xu, Shuo [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Xiuhe [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Cheeloo Coll Med, Dept Neurol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Cheeloo Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Inst Brain & Brain Inspired Sci, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Cheeloo Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Univ, Res Inst, Magnet Field Free Med & Funct Imaging, Natl Med Engn Interdisciplinary Ind Educ Integrat, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
epilepsy; vagus nerve stimulation; drug-resistant epilepsy; prognostic factors; rapid response; REFRACTORY EPILEPSY; PREDICTORS; EFFICACY; METAANALYSIS; SEIZURES; VNS;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2025.1564735
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has garnered widespread application in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), while the efficacy and prognostic factors of VNS in DRE remain elusive. Moreover, clinical determinants associated with rapid response to VNS have never been uncovered. This study aimed to elucidate factors influencing efficacy and rapid response to VNS. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with DRE undergoing VNS surgery from January 2014 to December 2023 was collected to describe VNS efficacy. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify statistically significant prognostic factors, and a predictive model was developed. Furthermore, we examined clinical determinants of rapid/slow response to VNS and VNS current changes. Results: A total of 65 patients underwent VNS implantation. Seizure frequency significantly decreased post-VNS, with mean seizure reduction rates of 35.7, 49.0, 48.5, 52.8, 63.2, and 66.8% at 6 (n = 65), 12 (n = 65), 24 (n = 50), 36 (n = 40), 60 (n = 31), and 84 (n = 19) months, respectively. At final follow-up, 61.5% (40/65) were responders (50-100% seizure reduction), and 10.8% (7/65) achieved seizure freedom for >= 1 year. Univariate analysis identified age at seizure onset >= 6 years (p = 0.003), baseline seizure frequency <= 30/month (p = 0.001), focal seizures (p = 0.002), developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (p = 0.037), and surgical history (p < 0.001) as significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis confirmed age at seizure onset >= 6 years (OR: 5.726, p = 0.039), baseline seizure frequency <= 30/month (OR: 4.697, p = 0.048), and focal seizures (OR: 4.791, p = 0.025) as independent predictors, enabling the development of a predictive model for VNS efficacy. Additionally, among responders, the median response duration was 6 months (range: 1-60 months), with baseline seizure frequency <= 30/month significantly associated with rapid response of VNS in DRE (<6 months, p = 0.033). Conclusion: Vagus nerve stimulation is effective for treating DRE, with efficacy increasing with follow-up duration. Age at seizure onset >= 6 years, baseline seizure frequency <= 30/month, and focal seizure were predictive of VNS success, underscoring the need for careful preoperative assessment of patients with DRE before VNS surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Long-term multicenter experience with vagus nerve stimulation for intractable partial seizures - Results of the XE5 trial [J].
Amar, AP ;
DeGiorgio, CM ;
Tarver, WB ;
Apuzzo, MLJ .
STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 73 (1-4) :104-108
[2]   Can we predict the response in the treatment of epilepsy with vagus nerve stimulation? [J].
Arcos, A. ;
Romero, L. ;
Gelabert, M. ;
Prieto, A. ;
Pardo, J. ;
Rodriguez Osorio, X. ;
Arraez, M. A. .
NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2014, 37 (04) :661-667
[3]  
Association C E C o t N B o t C M D, 2015, J Chin Phys, V17, P967, DOI [10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2015.07.003, DOI 10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-1372.2015.07.003]
[4]   A Comprehensive Review of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression [J].
Austelle, Christopher W. ;
O'Leary, Georgia H. ;
Thompson, Sean ;
Gruber, Elise ;
Kahn, Alex ;
Manett, Andrew J. ;
Short, Baron ;
Badran, Bashar W. .
NEUROMODULATION, 2022, 25 (03) :309-315
[5]   Responders to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in refractory epilepsy have reduced interictal cortical synchronicity on scalp EEG [J].
Bodin, Clementine ;
Aubert, Sandrine ;
Daquin, Geraldine ;
Carron, Romain ;
Scavarda, Didier ;
McGonigal, Aileen ;
Bartolomei, Fabrice .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2015, 113 :98-103
[6]   Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: is output current correlated with acute response? [J].
Bunch, S. ;
DeGiorgia, C. M. ;
Krahl, S. ;
Britton, J. ;
Green, P. ;
Lancman, M. ;
Murphy, J. ;
Olejniczak, P. ;
Shih, J. ;
Heck, C. N. .
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 116 (04) :217-220
[7]   The Correlation Between Vagus Nerve Stimulation Efficacy and Partial Onset Epilepsies [J].
Burakgazi, Ahmet Z. ;
Burakgazi-Dalkilic, Evren ;
Caputy, Anthony J. ;
Potolicchio, Samuel J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 28 (04) :380-383
[8]  
Chinese Neuromodulation Society Neuromodulation of China Association Against Epilepsy N G Society of Neurosurgery Chinese Medical Association, 2021, J Epilepsy, V7, P191, DOI [10.7507/2096-0247.20210031, DOI 10.7507/2096-0247.20210031]
[9]   Vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A meta-analysis [J].
Dibue, Maxine ;
Greco, Teresa ;
Spoor, Jochem K. H. ;
Tahir, Zubair ;
Specchio, Nicola ;
Haenggi, Daniel ;
Steiger, Hans-Jakob ;
Kamp, Marcel A. .
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 143 (05) :497-508
[10]   Efficacy of adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Dravet syndrome: A meta-analysis of 68 patients [J].
Dibue-Adjei, Maxine ;
Fischer, Igor ;
Steiger, Hans-Jakob ;
Kamp, Marcel Alexander .
SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2017, 50 :147-152