Technical efficiency of national HIV/AIDS spending in 78 countries between 2010 and 2018: A data envelopment analysis

被引:9
作者
Allel, Kasim [1 ]
Jaoude, Gerard Joseph Abou [1 ]
Birungi, Charles [1 ,2 ]
Palmer, Tom [1 ]
Skordis, Jolene [1 ]
Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Global Hlth, London, England
[2] United Nations Joint Programme HIV & AIDS UNAIDS, Harare, Zimbabwe
来源
PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH | 2022年 / 2卷 / 08期
关键词
HIV; PREVALENCE; MORTALITY; AFRICA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pgph.0000463
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
HIV/AIDS remains a leading global cause of disease burden, especially in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). In 2020, more than 80% of all people living with HIV (PLHIV) lived in LMICs. While progress has been made in extending coverage of HIV/AIDS services, only 66% of all PLHIV were virally suppressed at the end of 2020. In addition to more resources, the efficiency of spending is key to accelerating progress towards global 2030 targets for HIV/AIDs, including viral load suppression. This study aims to estimate the efficiency of HIV/AIDS spending across 78 countries. We employed a data envelopment analysis (DEA) and a truncated regression to estimate the technical efficiency of 78 countries, mostly low- and middle-income, in delivering HIV/AIDS services from 2010 to 2018. Publicly available data informed the model. We considered national HIV/AIDS spending as the DEA input, and prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) and antiretroviral treatment (ART) as outputs. The model was adjusted by independent variables to account for country characteristics and investigate associations with technical efficiency. On average, there has been substantial improvement in technical efficiency overtime. Spending was converted into outputs almost twice as efficiently in 2018 (81.8%; 95% CI = 77.64, 85.99) compared with 2010 (47.5%; 95% CI = 43.4, 51.6). Average technical efficiency was 66.9% between 2010 and 2018, in other words 33.1% more outputs could have been produced relative to existing levels for the same amount of spending. There is also some variation between WHO/UNAIDS regions. European and Eastern and Southern Africa regions converted spending into outputs most efficiently between 2010 and 2018. Rule of Law, Gross National Income, Human Development Index, HIV prevalence and out-of-pocket expenditures were all significantly associated with efficiency scores. The technical efficiency of HIV investments has improved overtime. However, there remains scope to substantially increase HIV/AIDS spending efficiency and improve progress towards 2030 global targets for HIV/ AIDS. Given that many of the most efficient countries did not meet 2020 global HIV targets, our study supports the WHO call for additional investment in HIV/AIDS prevention and control to meet the 2030 HIV/AIDS and eradication of the AIDS epidemic.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   National tuberculosis spending efficiency and its associated factors in 121 low-income and middle-income countries, 2010-19: a data envelopment and stochastic frontier analysis [J].
Abou Jaoude, Gerard Joseph ;
Baena, Ines Garcia ;
Nguhiu, Peter ;
Siroka, Andrew ;
Palmer, Tom ;
Gosce, Lara ;
Allel, Kasim ;
Sinanovic, Edina ;
Skordis, Jolene ;
Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan .
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 10 (05) :E649-E660
[2]   Measuring financial risk protection in health benefits packages: scoping review protocol to inform allocative efficiency studies [J].
Abou Jaoude, Gerard Joseph ;
Skordis-Worrall, Jolene ;
Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05)
[3]   Measuring the efficiency of health systems in Asia: a data envelopment analysis [J].
Ahmed, Sayem ;
Hasan, Md Zahid ;
MacLennan, Mary ;
Dorin, Farzana ;
Ahmed, Mohammad Wahid ;
Hasan, Md Mehedi ;
Hasan, Shaikh Mehdi ;
Islam, Mohammad Touhidul ;
Khan, Jahangir A. M. .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (03)
[4]   HIV Spending as a Share of Total Health Expenditure: An Analysis of Regional Variation in a Multi-Country Study [J].
Amico, Peter ;
Aran, Christian ;
Avila, Carlos .
PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (09)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, World Bank Data
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS: The gap report
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, POLITICAL DECLARATIO
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2019, World bank country and lending groups
[10]  
[Anonymous], Global Health Observatory