Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Knee Osteoarthritis

被引:0
作者
Wu, Ssu-Hsuan [1 ]
Lin, Chueh-Ho [2 ,3 ]
Hsu, Tzu-Yun [4 ]
Liou, Tsan-Hon [4 ,5 ]
Escorpizo, Reuben [6 ,7 ]
Chen, Hung-Chou [4 ,5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ, Int PhD Program Gerontol & Long Term Care, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Wan Fang Hosp, Res Ctr Nursing Clin Practice, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, 291,Zhongjheng Rd, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan
[5] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Univ Vermont, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil & Movement Sci, Burlington, VT USA
[7] Swiss Paraplegic Res, Nottwil, Switzerland
[8] Taipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Hlth Care, New Taipei City, Taiwan
关键词
Knee Osteoarthritis; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation; Meta-analysis; Systematic Review; PAIN; MANAGEMENT; SHAM;
D O I
10.1097/PHM.0000000000002530
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in knee osteoarthritis.MethodsThe study searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases until August 3, 2023, and identified randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in knee osteoarthritis whose outcomes using pain scores or functional scales. The selected randomized controlled trials were subjected to meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment.ResultsSeven randomized controlled trials involving 488 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, the transcranial direct current stimulation group exhibited significant improvement in pain scores after treatment (standardized mean difference = 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 1.35; n = 359; I2 = 46%), pain scores during follow-up (standardized mean difference = 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.21 to 1.45; n = 358; I2 = 86%), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis scores after treatment (standardized mean difference = 4.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 9.53; n = 319; I2 = 74%), but Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis scores during follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (standardized mean difference = 0.06; 95% confidence interval: -0.2 to 0.32; n = 225; I2 = 0%).ConclusionsTranscranial direct current stimulation is a promising therapy for knee osteoarthritis. Further investigation using large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials is necessary for optimal transcranial direct current stimulation approach in knee osteoarthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 65
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation for pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled study [J].
Martorella, Geraldine ;
Mathis, Kenneth ;
Miao, Hongyu ;
Wang, Duo ;
Park, Lindsey ;
Ahn, Hyochol .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2022, 15 (04) :902-909
[22]   Non pharmacological treatment for neuropathic pain: Invasive and non-invasive cortical stimulation [J].
Moisset, X. ;
Lefaucheur, J-P .
REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2019, 175 (1-2) :51-58
[23]   Knee osteoarthritis: pathophysiology and current treatment modalities [J].
Mora, Juan C. ;
Przkora, Rene ;
Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel .
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 11 :2189-2196
[24]   The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis [J].
Neogi, T. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2013, 21 (09) :1145-1153
[25]  
Ngernyam N., 2013, Journal of pain relief
[26]   Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions [J].
Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin ;
Cardenas-Rojas, Alejandra ;
Thibaut, Aurore ;
Costa, Beatriz ;
Ferreira, Isadora ;
Caumo, Wolnei ;
Fregni, Felipe .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2020, 17 (09) :879-898
[27]  
Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1136/bmj.n71]
[28]   Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence from In Vitro and In Vivo Models [J].
Pelletier, Simon J. ;
Cicchetti, Francesca .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 18 (02) :1-13
[29]   Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain [J].
Pinto, Camila Bonin ;
Costa, Beatriz Teixeira ;
Duarte, Dante ;
Fregni, Felipe .
JOURNAL OF ECT, 2018, 34 (03) :E36-E50
[30]   The effect of transcranial direct stimulation as an add-on treatment to conventional physical therapy on pain intensity and functional ability in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Rahimi, Fatemeh ;
Nejati, Vahid ;
Nassadj, Gholamhossein ;
Ziaei, Bahare ;
Mohammadi, Hossein Kouhzad .
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 51 (06) :507-516