Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the SOSG-OQ 2.0 Questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese

被引：0

作者：

Batista, Matheus ^{[1
]}

Pokorny, Gabriel ^{[1
]}

Bitencourt Jr, Carlos Augusto Belchior ^{[2
]}

Bento, Marcella de Almeida ^{[3
]}

Soeira, Thabata Pasquini ^{[4
]}

Herrero, Carlos Fernando Pereira da Silva ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Inst Patol Coluna, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

[2] Inst Assistencia Med Servidor Publ Estadual IAMSPE, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil

[4] Ctr Univ Estacio Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil

来源：

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ORTOPEDIA | 2024年 / 59卷 / 01期

关键词：

spine/surgery; surveys and questionnaires; neoplasm metastasis; quality of life; translations; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; METASTATIC-DISEASE; SPINE; HEALTH; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; VERSION; PROMIS;

D O I：

10.1055/s-0043-1775890

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objective: To perform the cross-cultural adaptation and translation into Brazilian Portuguese of the Spine Oncology Study Group - Outcomes Questionnaire 2.0 (SOSG-OQ 2.0) to enable its application to Brazilian patients and to allow Brazilian researchers to use a questionnaire that is on trend in the scientific literature. Materials and Methods: The present is a basic, non-randomized, non-comparative study. The translation followed the proposal by Reichenheime and Moraes, mainly for the semantic equivalence and measurement equivalence sessions, as well as the recommendations by Coster and Mancini mainly in the translation stage. The stages were as follows: first - translation into Brazilian Portuguese; second - back-translation; third - semantic comparison; fourth - validation of the final construct. Results: The translations of the SOSG-OQ 2.0 made by three translators presented a high degree of similarity for most questions. The translators kept all question titles and subtitles, as well as their internal and external orders. Two sworn translators, with native proficiency in English, performed the back-translation of the amalgamated text. Both back-translations were quite similar, and any differences were solved through consensus between the main author and the sworn translators, and the translated text was considered the final version. Conclusion: The present study shows a translated version of the SOSG-OQ 2.0 with semantic validity with the original version published in English. As such, researchers can apply the questionnaire to the Brazilian population, adding another tool for spine surgeons to improve the monitoring of this complex group of patients.

引用

页码：e38 / e45

页数：8

共 37 条

[11]

Coster W J., Rev Ter Ocup Univ Sao Paulo, V26, P50

[12] Validation of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score and the national acute spinal cord injury study (NASCIS) motor score [J].