Crossovers between Sustainability Transitions Research and Social Practice Theory: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:1
作者
Uden, Martinus Franciscus Mohandas van [1 ]
Wamelink, Johannes Wilhelmus Franciscus [1 ]
Bueren, Ellen Maria van [1 ]
Heurkens, Erwin Wilhelmus Theodurus Martinus [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands
来源
CLEANER PRODUCTION LETTERS | 2024年 / 7卷
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Crossovers; Framework; Sustainability Transition research; Social Practice theory; Transitions; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; CONSUMPTION; REGIMES; POWER; FOOD; TECHNOLOGY; GOVERNANCE; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100083
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Researchers employ many different approaches to study transitions towards more sustainable futures, of which Sustainability Transitions Research and Social Practice Theory are often used. These approaches offer complementary concepts that are helpful to analyse, explain, forecast, and drive sustainability transitions, e.g. heuristics on changing institutions (Sustainability Transitions Research) or dynamics to change behaviour through practice development (Social Practice Theory). However, despite first attempts, it remains unclear how the approaches can be used together. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to expose crossover frameworks in which these approaches are used together, elaborating on conditions that make this possible, and the strengths and weaknesses of specific crossover frameworks. A systematic literature review has been conducted, investigating the potentials and the limitations for crossovers between Social Practice Theory and Sustainability Transitions Research by analysing the approaches according to the different ontologies and theories and then analysing frameworks that have been created so far. This research elaborates on six crossover frameworks that have been created that all have diverse strengths, such as the ability to conceptualize early transitional changes or finding points of resistance in transitions. All the found crossover frameworks made use of either the multilevel perspective or transition management. Other frameworks of transition research have not been found. This research shows that there has been surprisingly little research to crossover frameworks that incorporate an element of time. The exposition following from this study is interesting for researchers and policymakers working on sustainability transitions and sets an agenda for further framework development.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Wittmayer, Julia M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) :628-649
[2]   The use of regulatory taxation as a policy instrument for sustainability transitions: old wine in new bottles or unexplored potential? [J].
Bachus, Kris ;
Vanswijgenhoven, Frederic .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 61 (09) :1469-1486
[3]  
Bakens W, 2015, INNOV BUILT ENVIR, P149
[4]   Engaging or resisting? How forest-based industry and private forest owners respond to bioenergy policies in Aquitaine (Southwestern France) [J].
Banos, Vincent ;
Deuffic, Philippe ;
Brahic, Elodie .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2022, 144
[5]   Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Carlsson, Bo ;
Lindmark, Sven ;
Rickne, Annika .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (03) :407-429
[6]   Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar [J].
Bergman, Elaine M. Lasda .
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2012, 38 (06) :370-379
[7]   From technical innovations towards social practices and socio-technical transition? Re-thinking the transition to decentralised solar PV electrification in Africa [J].
Boamah, Festus ;
Rothfuss, Eberhard .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 42 :1-10
[8]   Future Low-Carbon Transport Scenarios: Practice Theory-Based Visioning for Backcasting Studies [J].
Camilleri, Rosalie ;
Attard, Maria ;
Hickman, Robin .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
[9]   Infrastructures, intersections and societal transformations [J].
Cass, Noel ;
Schwanen, Tim ;
Shove, Elizabeth .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 137 :160-167
[10]   Anchoring innovations in oscillating domestic spaces: Why sanitation service offerings fail in informal settlements [J].
Cherunya, Pauline C. ;
Ahlborg, Helene ;
Truffer, Bernhard .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (01)