Digital finance, institutional quality, and air pollution: Evidence from China

被引:1
作者
Li, Bo [1 ]
Jia, Xuemei [1 ]
Liu, Zhenya [2 ]
Ma, Fengping [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Int Studies Univ, Business Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] EM Normandie Business Sch, Matis Lab, Le Havre, France
关键词
Digital finance; Institutional quality; Air pollution; Spatial durbin model; GOVERNANCE; IMPACTS; MATTER; PM2.5; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102997
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Understanding the relationship between digital finance, institutional quality, and air pollution is crucial to crafting effective environmental policies, particularly in the context of China's significant strides in the digital era. The study examines how institutional quality moderates the spatial effect of digital finance on air pollution in China. Using data from 30 provinces (2011-2021), it reveals that digital finance growth correlates with improving air quality and becomes more geographically concentrated over time. Institutional quality significantly strengthens digital finance's positive spatial impact on air quality, especially in well-governed areas, with the indirect impact through institutional quality outweighing the direct one. The findings emphasize the importance of strong institutional quality for environmental management via digital finance.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Digital Finance, Environmental Regulation, and Green Technology Innovation: An Empirical Study of 278 Cities in China [J].
Hu, Yiqun ;
Dai, Xiong ;
Zhao, Li .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (14)
[22]   The Moderating Effect of Institutional Quality on the Financial Development and Environmental Quality Nexus [J].
Hunjra, Ahmed Imran ;
Tayachi, Tahar ;
Chani, Muhammad Irfan ;
Verhoeven, Peter ;
Mehmood, Asad .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
[23]   Temperature and air pollution reductions by urban green spaces are highly valued in a tropical city-state [J].
Jaung, Wanggi ;
Carrasco, L. Roman ;
Shaikh, Shaikh Fairul Edros Ahmad ;
Tan, Puay Yok ;
Richards, Daniel R. .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2020, 55
[24]   Digital finance and corporate green investment: A perspective from institutional investors and environmental regulations [J].
Javeed, Sohail Ahmad ;
Latief, Rashid ;
Cai, Xiang ;
San Ong, Tze .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 446
[25]   Time and frequency domain connectedness and spill-over among fintech, green bonds and cryptocurrencies in the age of the fourth industrial revolution [J].
Le, TN-Lan ;
Abakah, Emmanuel Joel Aikins ;
Tiwari, Aviral Kumar .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 162
[26]  
LeSage J, 2009, STAT TEXTB MONOGR, P1
[27]   Digital finance and sustainable development: Evidence from environmental inequality in China [J].
Li, Guoxiang ;
Zhang, Rong ;
Feng, Suling ;
Wang, Yuqing .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (07) :3574-3594
[28]   Strategic or substantive innovation? The effect of government environmental punishment on enterprise green technology innovation [J].
Li, Xin ;
Guo, Fei ;
Xu, Qiong ;
Wang, Siwei ;
Huang, Hongyun .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (05) :3365-3386
[29]   The digital economy, market integration and environmental gains [J].
Liang, Benbo ;
He, Gailei ;
Wang, Yuran .
GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 60
[30]   Has central environmental protection inspection improved air quality? Evidence from 291 Chinese cities [J].
Lin, Jiayi ;
Long, Cuihong ;
Yi, Chengzhi .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 90