Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance Performance and Carbon Washing in China

被引:0
作者
Zeng, Qingchao [1 ]
Xu, Nuo [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Dongfang Coll, Accounting Sch, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
carbon disclosure; carbon washing; ESG performance; greenwashing triangle; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
D O I
10.28992/ijsam.v8i1.905
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
By focusing on a specific type of greenwashing behavior concerning carbon emission reductions, (i.e., carbon washing), the aim of this study is to investigate its antecedents in ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) performance and find relevant solutions in Chinese context. This study is designed under a framework of greenwashing triangle for both analysis and examination. The measurement of carbon washing is based on text analysis and content analysis of non-financial reports, and the results are obtained by ordinary least squares regression. The results show a negative relationship between firms' ESG performance and carbon washing tendency, which is mediated through lowering the standardization of carbon disclosure. To combat it, reducing opportunities and rationalizations are both effective avenues, while reducing pressure leads to complicated results. The results offer enlightenment for the cautious usage and regulation of firms' carbon disclosures. Understanding the causes of carbon washing helps to distinguish good performers from poor performers concerning carbon reductions, hence increasing market efficiency. Finding relevant solutions helps to fight carbon washing acts and improve the quality of carbon information. The value of the study is offering new insights in the mis informativeness of carbon disclosure, which helps avoid the generalities in conventional discussions of greenwashing. The measurement of carbon washing is original, based on previous researches.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 124
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, DOI [10.1108/09513570410567791, DOI 10.1108/09513570410567791]
[2]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[3]  
Black R., 2021, TAKING STOCK GLOBAL
[4]   Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and cost of equity: A cross-country comparison [J].
Breuer, Wolfgang ;
Mueller, Torbjoern ;
Rosenbach, David ;
Salzmann, Astrid .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2018, 96 :34-55
[5]  
Deegan C., 1996, Accounting Business Research, V26, P187, DOI DOI 10.1080/00014788.1996.9729510
[6]  
European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), 2021, ESMA calls for legislative action on esg ratings and assessment tools
[7]  
Gray R., 1995, Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, V8, P47, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513579510146996
[8]   Twenty Years of Accounting and Finance Research on the Chinese Capital Market [J].
Han, Jianlei ;
He, Jing ;
Pan, Zheyao ;
Shi, Jing .
ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2018, 54 (04) :576-599
[9]   Corporate ESG performance and manager misconduct: Evidence from China [J].
He, Feng ;
Du, Hanyu ;
Yu, Bo .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 82
[10]  
Huang S.Z., 2022, Account. Finan. Month., V1, P3