A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind Trial Evaluating a Multi-Porous Urethral Catheter with Continuous Local Ropivacaine Infusion for the Reduction of Postoperative Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort

被引:0
作者
Lee, Sangmin [1 ]
Kim, Kwang Taek [2 ]
Kim, Tae Beom [2 ]
Chung, Kyung Jin [2 ]
Huh, Kookjin [3 ]
Kim, Hwanik [3 ]
Song, Sang Hoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Gil Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Incheon 21565, South Korea
[3] Hallym Univ, Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Anyang 14068, South Korea
关键词
anesthetics; local; pain; postoperative; randomized controlled trial; ropivacaine; urologic surgical procedures; urinary catheterization; EFFICACY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/jcm14124215
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) commonly occurs in patients undergoing urologic surgery and significantly affects patient comfort and recovery. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of continuous local ropivacaine infusion using a specialized multi-porous urethral catheter in reducing postoperative CRBD. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind trial enrolled 136 male patients undergoing short-term catheterization after urologic surgery. Participants were randomized into three groups-a control group receiving saline infusion, Group 1 receiving 0.5% ropivacaine at 1 mL/h, and Group 2 receiving 0.5% ropivacaine at 2 mL/h-for up to 48 h via a multi-porous urethral catheter. The primary outcome was the incidence of CRBD at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included changes in urethral pain assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS), urinary symptom scores, complication rates, and patient-reported catheter inconvenience and reuse intention using Likert scales. Results: The incidence of CRBD was significantly lower in Group 1 (19.6%) and Group 2 (11.1%) compared to the control group (44.4%; p = 0.001), demonstrating a clear dose-response relationship. Changes in urethral pain scores (VAS) from baseline were significantly lower in the ropivacaine groups compared to the control (p = 0.023). Complication rates were similar among groups (control 13.3%, Group 1 6.5%, Group 2 15.6%; p = 0.378), although catheter leakage occurred more frequently in Group 2, without statistical significance (p = 0.122). Conclusions: Continuous local ropivacaine infusion using a multi-porous urethral catheter effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative CRBD without increasing side effects. This approach may improve patient comfort during perioperative catheter management.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[21]   Comparison of Different Strategies for Prevention of Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Sipahioglu, Fatma Ozkan ;
Akaslan, Filiz Karaca ;
Mumcu, Ozge Yamankilic ;
Polat, Reyhan ;
Sandikci, Fatih ;
Donmez, Asli .
HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2022, 60 (04) :295-302
[22]   Effects of an intraoperative intravenous Bolus Dose of Dexmedetomidine on postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort in male patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial [J].
Zhang, Tianhua ;
Li, Huiting ;
Lin, Chunnan ;
An, Rui ;
Lin, Wenqian ;
Tan, Hongying ;
Cao, Longhui .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 80 (03) :465-474
[23]   The efficacy and safety of antimuscarinics for the prevention or treatment of catheter-related bladder discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Zhou, Zhongbao ;
Cui, Yuanshan ;
Zhang, Xiaoyi ;
Lu, Youyi ;
Chen, Zhipeng ;
Zhang, Yong .
PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (01)
[24]   Benefit-risk assessment of ropivacaine in the management of postoperative pain [J].
Zink, W ;
Graf, BM .
DRUG SAFETY, 2004, 27 (14) :1093-1114