Political Liberalism, Exclusion and Metapluralism: A Critical Analysis of John Tomasi's Account of the Moral Powers of Citizenship

被引:0
作者
Clarke, Joshua [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Inst Philosophy, Kardinaal Mercierpl 2,Box 3200, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
John Tomasi; political liberalism; John Rawls; moral powers; market democracy; citizenship;
D O I
10.1515/mopp-2024-0072
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Upon reading Free Market Fairness, it is apparent that John Tomasi's defence of market democracy relies on a certain conception of political personality qua citizenship in which the idea of self-authorship is afforded a primary role. With the goal of both clarifying and assessing the merits of said conception, this article begins with a delimitation of Rawls's and John Tomasi's account of political personhood qua citizenship. It then moves on to provide several interpretations of the central causality clause associated with Tomasi's first moral power, favouring a so-called ontological interpretation. Building upon this, the article goes on to argue that Tomasi's account brings to light problems of exclusivity and metapluralism which afflict, and cast doubt upon, the broader project of political liberalism.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Against the Moral Powers Test of basic liberty [J].
Brennan, Jason .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2020, 28 (02) :492-505
[2]  
Brennan Jason., 2012, Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy, P115
[3]  
Cohen Joshua., 1993, The Idea of Democracy
[4]  
Constant B., 1988, Constant: Political Writings, P308
[5]   THE CONCEPT OF POWER [J].
DAHL, RA .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1957, 2 (03) :201-215
[6]  
Eddington A., 1928, The Nature of the Physical World
[7]   All Liberty is Basic [J].
Flanigan, Jessica .
RES PUBLICA-A JOURNAL OF MORAL LEGAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2018, 24 (04) :455-474
[8]  
GALLIE WB, 1956, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V56, P167
[10]  
Habermas J., 1996, FACTS NORMS CONTRIBU