Participatory design: a systematic review and insights for future practice

被引:0
作者
Wacnik, Peter [1 ]
Daly, Shanna R. [2 ]
Verma, Aditi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Design Sci Program, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Mech Engn, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Nucl Engn & Radiol Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
DESIGN SCIENCE | 2025年 / 11卷
关键词
Design science; Participatory design; Equitable design; Human-centered design; Design Thinking; PERCEPTIONS; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES; THINKING; PD;
D O I
10.1017/dsj.2025.10009
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Participatory Design - an iterative, flexible design process that closely involves stakeholders, often end users - is growing in use across design disciplines. As more practitioners use Participatory Design (PD), it has become less rigidly defined, with stakeholders engaged to varying degrees through disjointed techniques. This ambiguity can be counterproductive when discussing PD processes. We performed a systematic literature review that builds shared, foundational knowledge of PD processes and techniques while also summarizing the state of PD research in the field, as a first step in supporting richer understandings of how best to equitably engage with stakeholders. We found that a majority of PD literature examined specific case studies of PD, with the design of intangible systems representing the most common design context. Stakeholders most often participated throughout multiple stages of a design process, recruited in a variety of ways, and engaged in several of the 14 specific participatory techniques identified. Our findings also identify leverage points for creators of PD processes and how the leverage points impact design equity, including: (1) emergent versus predetermined processes; (2) direct versus indirect participation; (3) early versus late participation; (4) one time versus iterative participation; and (5) singular versus multiple PD techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Adams W. G., 1988, Design Studies, V9, P14, DOI [10.1016/0142-694X(88)90023-3, DOI 10.1016/0142-694X(88)90023-3]
[2]   The Open Paradigm in Design Research [J].
Aitamurto, Tanja ;
Holland, Donal ;
Hussain, Sofia .
DESIGN ISSUES, 2015, 31 (04) :17-29
[3]   Participatory Surveillance in the Intelligent Building [J].
Albrechtslund, Anders ;
Ryberg, Thomas .
DESIGN ISSUES, 2011, 27 (03) :35-46
[4]   ENGINEERING PRACTICE AND CODEVELOPMENT OF PRODUCT PROTOTYPES [J].
ANDERSON, WL ;
CROCCA, WT .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1993, 36 (06) :49-56
[5]  
Antle A., 2004, P 2004 C INTERACTION, P97, DOI DOI 10.1145/1017833.1017846
[6]   Integration of value and sustainability assessment in design space exploration by machine learning: an aerospace application [J].
Bertoni, Alessandro ;
Hallstedt, Sophie I. ;
Dasari, Siva Krishna ;
Andersson, Petter .
DESIGN SCIENCE, 2020, 6
[7]   APPRENTICING WITH THE CUSTOMER [J].
BEYER, HR ;
HOLTZBLATT, K .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1995, 38 (05) :45-52
[8]  
Bjögvinsson E, 2012, DES ISSUES, V28, P101
[9]   Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work [J].
Bodker, Susanne ;
Dindler, Christian ;
Iversen, Ole Sejer .
COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK-THE JOURNAL OF COLLABORATIVE COMPUTING, 2017, 26 (1-2) :245-273
[10]  
Bossen C., 2006, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design Expanding Boundaries in Design PDC06, V1, P95, DOI [10.1145/1147261.1147276, DOI 10.1145/1147261.1147276]