Privacy as Contextual Integrity in Online Proctoring Systems in Higher Education: A scoping review

被引:0
作者
Mutimukwe, Chantal [1 ]
Han, Shengnan [1 ]
Viberg, Olga [2 ]
Cerratto-Pargman, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 56TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES | 2023年
关键词
privacy; online proctoring systems; higher education; contextual integrity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Privacy is one of the key challenges to the adoption and implementation of online proctoring systems (OPS) in higher education. To better understand this challenge, we adopt privacy as contextual integrity theory to conduct a scoping review of 17 papers. The results show different types of students' personal and sensitive information are collected and disseminated; this raises considerable privacy concerns. As well as the governing principles including transparency and fairness, consent and choice, information minimization, accountability, and information security and accuracy have been identified to address privacy problems. This study notifies a need to clarify how these principles should be implemented and sustained, and what privacy concerns and actors they relate to. Further, it calls for the need to clarify the responsibility of key actors in enacting and sustaining responsible adoption and use of OPS in higher education.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 82
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   Good Proctor or “Big Brother”? Ethics of Online Exam Supervision Technologies [J].
Coghlan S. ;
Miller T. ;
Paterson J. .
Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (4) :1581-1606
[12]  
Colonna L., 2022, LOYOLA U CHICAGO J R, V8, P18
[13]  
Draaijer Silvester, 2017, Technology Enhanced Assessment: 20th International Conference, TEA 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science (829), P96, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-97807-9_8
[14]  
Duric J., 2021, 2021 44 INT CONV INF, P654, DOI DOI 10.23919/MIPRO52101.2021.9596723
[15]   Dr. Proctor: A Multi-modal AI-Based Platform for Remote Proctoring in Education [J].
Elshafey, Ahmed E. ;
Anany, Mohammed R. ;
Mohamed, Amr S. ;
Sakr, Nourhan ;
Aly, Sherif G. .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION (AIED 2021), PT II, 2021, 12749 :145-150
[16]  
EU-GDPR, 2018, Article 4 EU GDPR "Definitions
[17]   Implementation of E-Proctoring in Online Teaching: A Study about Motivational Factors [J].
Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Carina S. ;
Infante-Moro, Alfonso ;
Infante-Moro, Juan C. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (08)
[18]  
Han S., 2022, 30 EUR C INF SYST EC
[19]  
Heath J., 2014, Journal of Learning Analytics, V1, P140, DOI DOI 10.18608/JLA.2014.11.8
[20]   Who Will Watch the Watchmen? The Ethico-political Arrangements of Algorithmic Proctoring for Academic Integrity [J].
Henry J.V. ;
Oliver M. .
Postdigital Science and Education, 2022, 4 (2) :330-353